Liberal corruption and incompetence.

Wind Turbine Owner Pays Resident $15,000.00, in “Hush” money.

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment
North Kingstown R.I. Residents Paid 15K To Keep Quiet Over Turbines

North Kingstown, Rhode Island

Court records: Former NK residents paid $15K not to disparage wind turbine
Print

NORTH KINGSTOWN — A couple who previously lived next to the 413-foot wind turbine in a subdivision off Ten Rod Road – and staunchly opposed its construction – were paid $15,000 by the turbine’s owner in 2011 and agreed not to publicly or privately disparage the project.
The couple, Scott and Nicole Newcombe, also agreed not to return any inquiries from the media about the turbine, or provide written or spoken comments about the turbine to any local, state or federal regulatory body, according to a signed copy of the confidential settlement agreement submitted in court documents as part of a civil lawsuit filed by the Newcombes.

The couple, formerly of 52 Thornton Way, filed the lawsuit against North Kingstown Green, Wind Energy Development LLC and Mark DePasquale in Washington County Superior Court on May 10. They now live in North Carolina.
DePasquale is the developer who built the North Kingstown Green subdivision and the owner of Wind Energy Development, which built the controversial turbine. He also is a resident of North Kingstown Green; the turbine is located adjacent to his home at 42 Thornton Way.
Although the turbine was approved by North Kingstown’s Planning Commission in May 2011, residents of North Kingstown Green came out in opposition to the turbine’s construction after the fact – contacting local media and speaking out in opposition to the turbine at Town Council meetings. They said they were not aware of “the particulars” of the turbine proposal and, despite signing a document that said they would support its construction, they opposed it.
In February 2011, the Newcombes and neighbors Colleen Clare, Sean Coen, Kim and Todd Teixeira, Munmun Das, Subhransu Mohanty and Shelley Anderson all signed a letter submitted to the Independent that laid out their concerns with the turbine.
“We at first did not oppose this project, however, with the recent developments surrounding [another proposed turbine at Stamp Farm on South County Trail] and all the new information available to us, we have become more informed of the magnitude and impact this turbine will have on our families’ health and safety, as well as the effect it will have on the perceived value of North Kingstown Green in general and our homes in particular,” the letter noted.
The proposed Stamp Farm turbine was never built.
The North Kingstown Green residents went on to write, “But, our primary concern doesn’t reside with the aesthetic harm to the beauty of our neighborhood and North Kingstown; it is the health and safety issues of our families, especially the children, that most concern us.”
As part of the approved plans, portions of land adjacent to the turbine were to be exchanged between DePasquale and landowners in the development, and property deeds were supposed to be transferred. While all of the North Kingstown Green residents signed letters consenting to the turbine’s construction, the actual paperwork for the deed transfers wasn’t filed with the town.
When some of the neighbors balked at signing the deed transfers, DePasquale filed a $25 million lawsuit against the neighbors in May 2011. A month later, a confidential settlement was reached between DePasquale and the neighbors, but the terms were never disclosed.
The outcry from the neighbors ceased and after the dust settled, the 413-foot Chinese-made Goldwind Global GW87 was erected in October of last year.
Under the terms of the agreement with the Newcombes, DePasquale agreed to pay $15,000 to the couple and would purchase their home for $612,500 if they decided to move. The terms of the confidential settlement agreements with other neighbors was not included in the court record.
When asked if the settlement agreement with the Newcombes was similar to agreements signed with the other neighbors, Brian LaPlante, the couple’s lawyer, said he didn’t know.
DePasquale’s lawyer, Steven Boyajian, declined comment Friday on the case.
According to town property records, the Newcombes bought the house for $575,000 in 2009. The 2013 assessed value is $522,700.
In DePasquale’s deposition, which is included in court documents, he said the agreement to buy the house for more than the selling price was “obscene,” but agreed to the settlement in order to resolve the issue.
The settlement agreement stipulated that if the Newcombes did decide to move, he would buy the house only after receiving federal grant money related to the turbine project, or 180 days after the turbine became operational – which occurred March 1, 2013.
If the Newcombes were able to sell the house on their own for less than the $612,500 figure, DePasquale would pay the difference as long as it was less than $150,000.
That agreement is now at the center of the most recent lawsuit the Newcombes have filed for breach of contract.
According to court documents, a woman who was a friend of the Newcombes contacted Phillips Post Road Realty earlier this year and said her sister was interested in purchasing the Newcombes’ property. She mentioned the Newcombes spoke of their displeasure with the turbine and the legal battle that took place in 2011.
A Realtor contacted the listing agent for the property, who said DePasquale was supposed to be buying the parcel back from the Newcombes, although the listing agent called back the Realtor later and said he wasn’t supposed to have mentioned that fact.
All of the parties involved in those conversations have been issued subpoenas to be deposed.
In the lawsuit, LaPlante argued that the Newcombes “have suffered and will continue to suffer severe and substantial damages” and the settlement agreement was a “valid, binding and enforceable contract.” They asked for the court to issue a declatory judgment and award punitive damages.
Boyajian, however, argued the Newcombes broke the terms of the contract when they discussed the terms of the settlement, the turbine and their displeasure with it with a potential buyer. He said DePasquale has “suffered damages including the loss of a potential purchase of the property,” and asked Superior Court Judge Kristin Rodgers to dismiss the case and order the Newcombes to pay $30,000 in costs associated with defending the lawsuit.
LaPlante asked for Rodgers to issue a summary judgment in the case and argued that the alleged breach – which the Newcombes deny occurred – did not interfere with the construction and operation of the turbine and that the basis of the confidential settlement agreement was to move the project forward to completion. He also argued that DePasquale has not lost any money over the alleged breach.
DePasquale’s lawyers argue it is difficult to quantify any losses associated with “bad publicity” from the dispute with the neighbors. In his deposition, DePasquale said he has been appearing before the Westerly Town Council seeking permission to build two wind turbines in town and that the council continues to make reference to the North Kingstown turbine and the controversy that surrounded it.
Rodgers denied the requests from both lawyers for a ruling and, according to court records, the case was been assigned for trial but no date has been set.
Hundreds of residents attended more than a dozen meetings in 2011 on both the North Kingstown Green turbine proposal and the Stamp Farm proposal. The majority of those residents voiced their staunch opposition to both turbines. Among their fears, opponents said the turbine could fall on a home and kill or injure someone, that their property values would be diminished and the flicker of light off the blades and sound could affect the quality of their lives and their health.
Since that time, the Town Council placed a moratorium on the construction of all wind turbines in town.
church@neindependent.com

church@neindependent.com
http://www.independentri.com/independents/north_east/article_ae66d34a-a3fd-549d-a3a4-04d20788de49.html

Court records: Former NK residents paid $15K not to disparage wind turbine

Tales of Torture! Living with 3mw Industrial Wind Turbines – Annie Gardner

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment

The Annie Gardner Story

Ep 475 Wind Turbine Wars

Annie Gardner joins us from Victoria to discuss her story regarding the incursion of the Wind Turbine Industry into their family farm. Together we discuss her story and what it is like to live beside 140 wind turbines 90 meters tall, and to feel the health effects from this assault.

We discuss the withholding of Freedom of Information documents pertaining to the comprehensive fraud being conducted against the people of the is country. We discuss the speech by John Madigan in the Senate declaring that Industry is colluding with Doctors and the Medical industry against We the People. Annie has been a tireless worker in the Resistance in an attempt to gain back power for We the People.

14.05.18 Annie Gardner.mp3

 

 http://fairdinkumradio.com/resources/14.05.18%20Annie%20Gardner.mp3

Wind Turbines Sufferer

21.3.13 Also we are joined by Annie Gardner a Farmer from SW Victoria as she shares her story of the effects of the MacArthur Wind Farm bordering her farm.

She discusses the effects on the community, personal health and the animals health. She shares how her business has been destroyed as a result of the Wind Farm operation.

The Liberals of Ontario are Destroying our Financial Future!

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment

Ontario worse than California:

Province faces crisis due to 78% jump in spending

Toronto's Queen's Park, home of the Ontario Legislative Building.

Peter J. Thompson/National PostToronto’s Queen’s Park, home of the Ontario Legislativ

Ontario faces crisis due to 78% jump in spending

‘I do not want Ontario to become like California,” Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan once proclaimed. And it’s not hard to understand why — California is a fiscal nightmare. It has the lowest bond rating in the United States and its own treasurer, Bill Lockyer, referred to the state budget as “a fiscal train wreck.”

Yet, despite all that is said about California’s finances in the media and financial markets, Ontario is in much worse shape.

Back in 2002-03, the fiscal year before the governing Liberals took office, Ontario’s net debt (assets minus liabilities) stood at $132.6-billion. In the ensuing decade, the province’s debt ballooned by almost 78% to $235.6-billion (2011-12). Most worrying, however, is that if Ontario continues on its current path (status quo in terms of spending and revenues), its debt will balloon to over $550-billion (66% of GDP) by the end of the decade (2019-20).

As the nearby table highlights, Ontario is decidedly worse than California on every measure of debt. For example, despite the fact that California’s population and economy are almost three times that of Ontario, Ontario’s total debt is 64.4% larger than ­California.

On a per-person basis, Ontario’s bonded debt (the concept of net debt is not used in U.S. public accounting) currently stands at nearly $18,000, over four-and-a-half times that of Californiaat $3,800. As a share of the economy, Ontario’s debt (38.6%) is more than five times that of the Golden State (7.7% of GDP). This is a stunning difference in the burden of debt, particularly given the attention and concern focused on California compared with Ontario.

While the two jurisdictions face similar average interest rates for their debt, the large difference in the stock of the debt means equally large differences in interest costs. Specifically, Ontario spends almost double what California does on interest costs in dollar terms and a little over three times what California spends as a share of the revenues collected, 8.9% compared to 2.8% of revenues. This is money that could have been spent on health care, education, public safety.

Thankfully, the Liberal government of Ontario, which just selected a new leader, Kathleen Wynne, has a real opportunity to break with past policies and fundamentally deal with its skyrocketing public debt.

There are two principal barriers holding back genuine efforts at tackling the province’s fiscal problems. The first is a basic misunderstanding of the province’s deficits and debt. More specifically, there is a view that Ontario’s deficits and mounting debt are a result of a lack of revenues. The data here tell a very different story.

In 2002-03, Ontario collected $74.9-billion in revenues and spent $65.1-billion on programs. Some $9.7-billion was spent on interest costs, which resulted in a balanced budget.

Revenues grew to $104.1-billion in 2007-08 (prior to the recession) before decreasing in 2008-09 and 2009-10. This year (2012-13), revenues are expected to be $112.2-billion, some $8-billion higher than the pre-recession high. All told, revenues have grown by 49.8% since 2002-03.

The problem is that provincial program spending has increased by 77.8% from 2002-03 to 2012-13. Simply put, Ontario has had a spending problem over the last decade, not a revenue problem.

The second barrier to dealing with the province’s deficits and debt is apathy. Ontarians are either unaware or uninterested in the province’s indebtedness. We should not be surprised by politicians and bureaucrats ignoring policy issues and the risks associated with them when the citizens of the province don’t seem concerned.

Take, for example, The Globe and Mail editorial the day after Wynne’s victory, which started with the headline “Premier-designate Kathleen Wynne must practise saying no.” If only it were that simple. “Saying no” would have been good advice back in 2002-03; now the new premier must boldly and quickly strike at the root of the problem: unsustainable increases in health care, education and most other government spending.

Or consider how the folks at the Business News Network reacted to our study by claiming: “The reality is once the economy starts growing strongly again in Ontario, revenues will rise and expenditures on things like welfare will fall. It’s not really about cutting spending; it’s about resuming economic growth.”

This indifference is buttressed by the near complete lack of any serious response by the Ontario government to the much-heralded report by the province’s own Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public Services, which became known as the Drummond commission. The commission’s report should have been a call to arms for the government to act on reform. Instead, inaction has ensued.

The reality is that Ontario’s indebtedness is significantly worse than the poster-child for bad public finances, California. The inaction to date only delays the inevitable and deepens the breadth and depth of changes needed later. The new premier has an opportunity to set the province on a new, sustainable path. Let us hope she both understands and embraces the need for change.

Financial Post

Jason Clemens and Niels Veldhuis are the editors of “State of Ontario’s Indebtedness: Warning Signs to Act,” recently released by the Fraser Institute.

ind F

Bird Deaths by Wind Turbines….NOT Sustainable!

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment


Red kite with broken wing awaiting slow death under wind turbine – courtesy of GURELUR
Red kite with broken wing, waiting for a slow death under a wind turbine – courtesy of GURELUR*.


HOW MUCH WILDLIFE CAN USA AFFORD TO KILL?
APRIL 2014



America’s wind farms are actually slaughtering millions of birds and bats annually


By Mark Duchamp


Originally published by The ECO Report


The Obama administration is issuing 30-year permits for “taking” (killing) bald and golden eagles. The great birds will be legally slaughtered “unintentionally” by lethal wind turbines installed in their breeding territories, and in “dispersion areas” where their young congregate (e.g. Altamont Pass).


By chance (if you believe in coincidences), a timely government study claims wind farms will kill “only” 1.4 million birds yearly by 2030 (1). This new report is just one of many, financed with taxpayers’ money, aimed at convincing the public that additional mortality caused by wind plants is sustainable. – It is not.


Dr. Shawn Smallwood’s 2004 study, spanning four years, estimated that California’s Altamont Pass wind “farm” killed an average of 116 Golden Eagles annually (2). This adds up to 2,900 dead “goldies” since it was built 25 years ago. Altamont is the biggest sinkhole for the species, but not the only one, and industry-financed research claiming that California’s GE population is stable is but a white-wash.

6_beheaded_golden_eagle_Altamont_Pass

Golden eagle remains, Altamont Pass windfarm, California – courtesy of Darryl Mueller



Eagles are not the only victims. Smallwood also estimated that Altamont killed an average of 300 red-tailed hawks, 333 American kestrels and 380 burrowing owls annually – plus even more non-raptors, including 2,526 rock doves and 2,557 western meadowlarks.


In 2012, breaking the European omerta on wind farm mortality, the Spanish Ornithological Society (SEO/Birdlife) reviewed actual carcass counts from 136 monitoring studies. They concluded that Spain’s 18,000 wind turbines are killing 6-18 million birds and bats yearly (3).


Extrapolating that and similar (little publicized) German and Swedish studies, 39,000 U.S. wind turbines would not be killing “only” 440,000 birds (USFWS, 2009) or “just” 573,000 birds and 888,000 bats (Smallwood, 2013) (4), but 13-39 million birds and bats every year!


However, this carnage is being covered up by self-serving and/or politically motivated government agencies, wind industry lobbyists, environmental groups and ornithologists, under a pile of misleading studies paid for with more taxpayer money.


Wildlife expert Jim Wiegand has documented how areas searched under wind turbines are still confined to 200-foot radiuses, even though modern monster turbines catapult 90% of bird and bat carcasses much further. Windfarm owners, operating under voluntary(!) USFWS guidelines, commission studies that search much-too-small areas, look only once every 30-90 days, ensuring that scavengers remove most carcasses, and ignore wounded birds that happen to be found within search perimeters (5).


These research protocols are designed to guarantee extremely low mortality statistics, hiding the true death tolls – and the USFWS seems inclined to let the deception continue. In addition, bird mortality data are now considered to be the property of windfarm owners, which means the public no longer has a right to know.


Nevertheless, news has leaked that eagles are being hacked to death all across America. This is hardly surprising, as raptors are attracted to wind turbines. They perch on them to rest or scan for prey. They come because turbines are often built in habitats that have abundant food (live or carrion) and good winds for gliding (6).


Save the Eagles International (STEI) has posted photographs of raptors perched on nacelles or nonmoving blades, and ospreys building a nest on a decommissioned turbine. Moving blades don’t deter them either: videos show a turkey vulture perched on the hub of a spinning turbine, and a griffon vulture being struck (6). Birds perceive areas traveled by spinning blades as open space, unaware that blade tips are moving at up to 180 mph. Many are focused on prey. These factors make wind turbines “ecological death traps,” wherever they are located.

Ospreys_new_home

Courtesy of Jefferson’s Leaning Left blog



By 2030, the United States plans to produce 20% of its electricity from wind. That’s nearly six times as much as today, from three or four times as many turbines, striking more flying creatures due to their bigger size (even the mendacious study predicting 1.4 million bird kills recognizes this). Using the higher but still underestimated level of mortality published by Smallwood in 2013, by 2030 our wind turbines would be killing over 3 million birds and 5 million bats annually.


But this is shy of reality by a factor of ten, because 90% of casualties land outside the search perimeter and are not counted. We are thus really talking about an unsustainable death toll of 30 million birds and 50 million bats a year – and more still if we factor in other hide-the-mortality tricks documented by STEI.


This carnage includes protected species that cars and cats rarely kill: eagles, hawks, falcons, owls, condors, whooping cranes, geese, bats and many others. The raptor slaughter will cause rodent populations to soar. Butchery of bats (7), already being decimated by White Nose Syndrome (8), will hammer agriculture.

BUITRES - 15.2 KB

Griffon vultures killed by wind turbine, Spain – courtesy of GURELUR*



The U.S. Geological Survey says the value of pest-control services to US agriculture provided by bats ranges from $3.7 billion to as much as $53 billion yearly (9). These chiropters alsocontrol forest pests and serve as pollinators. Swedish studies have documented theirattraction from nine miles away to insects that swarm around wind turbines (10). Hence the slaughter.


Wind lobbyists claim they need “regulatory certainty.” However, eagle “take” permits will also ensure extinction certainty – and ecological, agricultural, economic and social disasters that America cannot afford.




* GURELUR is an association of ecologists based in Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.


____________
Mark Duchamp is President of Save the Eagles International, and Chairman of the World Council for Nature

Industrial Wind Turbines are NOT Cost-Effective!

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment

Liberals are idiots on green energy

BradKath

 

FIRST POSTED: TUESDAY, MAY 20, 2014 06:09 PM EDT | UPDATED: TUESDAY, MAY 20, 2014  Antonella Artuso/Toronto Sun Files

Liberal MPP and former energy minister Brad Duguid says Tory Leader Tim Hudak is “completely irresponsible and out of his mind” for trying to extricate taxpayers and hydro consumers from the Liberals’ green energy disaster.

In fact, the only people who were completely out of their minds on the green energy file were Dalton McGuinty, Kathleen Wynne, Duguid and the entire Liberal cabinet and caucus.

First, their criticism of Hudak is a straw man.

They charge Hudak would be irresponsible to tear up absurdly generous, 20-year contracts the Liberals signed with wind and solar power developers for expensive and unreliable electricity.

Except Hudak didn’t say that. He said he won’t cancel approved projects that are already supplying power to the electricity grid because it would cost even more to walk away from them.

He did say he won’t approve new contracts and will review on a case by case basis contracts awaiting final approval from the energy minister.

Both of these measures are common sense, aimed at minimizing the enormous economic damage the Liberals have already inflicted on taxpayers, hydro consumers and manufacturers through their irresponsible green energy boondoggle.

Indeed, the only people who tore up signed energy deals in Ontario were the Liberals, who cancelled the Oakville and Mississauga gas-fired electricity plants at a public cost of up to $1.1 billion, to save five Liberal seats in the 2011 election.

The $1.1 billion figure comes from the non-partisan Auditor General of Ontario, who also concluded the premier’s office and energy ministry knee-capped provincial negotiators trying to reach a deal with the private developer building the plant, when they insisted all of its costs should be compensated before the negotiations had even started.

The auditor general further noted the Liberals ignored the advice of their own energy experts when they blundered into green energy without a business plan, thus adding billions of dollars in costs to taxpayers and hydro ratepayers for generations to come.

Finally, the Liberals didn’t need wind or solar power to eliminate coal-fired electricity, which they actually did by using nuclear power and natural gas.

In other words, only an idiot would have done exactly what the Liberals did on the green energy file.

 

Kathleen Wynne Tries to Woo Rural Ontarians….Too Little, Too Late!

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment

KATHLEEN WYNNE HOPES HER “FARMS FOREVER”

MESSAGE WILL BRIDGE RURAL/URBAN DIVIDE *GAG*

Richard J. Brennan — Toronto Star — May 19, 2014

BRANTFORD, ONT.—Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne is hoping that red rubber boots, a few kind words and lots of money will bridge the gap between urban and rural Ontario.
Wynne, who is agriculture minister as well as premier, visited a cattle ‎farm just outside of Brantford Tuesday where she recommitted the $400 million over 10 years contained in the budget to help farmer and the agri-food industry.
Wooing Tory blue areas outside theGTA is a major focus for the mostly urban supported Liberals‎.

“I am here because it is so critical that we understand the importance of the agri-food industry in Ontario,” she told reporters, who had successfully dodged cow patties.
“This is a $34 billion industry. There are thousands of farmers in Ontario . . . every one of them is important to the economy of the province,” she said.
Farmers have been suspicious of Wynne, a Toronto MPP‎, taking on the role of agriculture minister.
Wynne said she has heard time and again in her travels that farmers are concerned “about farmland staying farmland.”
“So another part of our plan is a farms forever plan that would facilitate agriculture easements so farmland can stay as farmland.”  Continue reading and LEAVE A COMMENT here….
.
piggy-wellies

Wind Turbine Victims, Tell Their Stories!

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment

“Vertigo so bad, I couldn’t drive or walk through

my house, without holding onto walls” (Falmouth, MA)

May 19, 2014

spinning_top_by_canonto

— Sharon in Falmouth, Mass. (5/18/14)

I have just gone through three weeks of vertigo that was so bad, I could not drive, walk through my house without holding onto walls, and dizziness even lying down. Another portion of my life, gone. I just turned 61 and never had a diagnosis of vertigo until the Falmouth wind turbines went up 3 to 4 years ago. The first time lasted 1.5 years.

My mother of 83 said they should build them next to the politicians who were all for them in the first place. God, I love my mom. Such practicial wisdom and common sense — something missing in our government as well as in most people I read about these days.

I believe one day, scientists and doctors will come together to study the impact of sound, its various levels, duration and distance, etc., on humans and wildlife. We already are aware of sleep deprivation and its negative impact on the human body and mind.

Unfortunately, the ignorance of these fields takes so long, they leave a wake of misery and death in their wake. I speak of events like multiple sclerosis, Lyme Disease, PTSD, and the list goes on.

Nevertheless, I believe in the old adage, “the squeaky wheel gets oiled.” I will not be silenced and will continue to write and vote against these wind turbines being located too near us.

 

Community Members Prepare to Defend Themselves Against Industrial Wind Turbines!

/ 1957chev / Leave a comment

These wind turbines are threatening watersheds & economy

Published Date Monday, 19 May 2014 08:24
Where’s the story?PointsMentioned Map1 Points Mentioned

To The Daily Sun,

It’s unusual that a $500 million investment in the Newfound Lake community is being greeted with such community concern. After all, when was the last time anyone invested that much money here?

Make no mistake about it, Newfound Lake is under attack, and it’s coming in the form of 500-foot industrial wind turbines on our ridge lines with all electricity being routed to southern states.

Newfound Lake and Cardigan residents are overwhelmingly united in their opposition to newly proposed industrial wind plants. And Concord is very well aware of our community stance against additional wind development through our direct testimonies and detailed objections. Residents have officially voted twice against additional development and have also voted-in a new “Rights Based Ordinances” laws. And yes, for much of this past winter our voices have been raised and our tempers have flared at these town hall meetings.

Remember there is no shortage of electricity in N.H. N.H. has been exporting excess electricity to southern states for decades. It’s a very successful model — and many residents are questioning why we would consider hurting that model. But the million dollar question that remains is: “Why are we paying for any of this?”

Our story is very different. These turbines are threatening our watersheds, threatening our tourism, threatening our local economy and is threatening our “Natural Rights” and our “Quality of Place”.

We are not going down without a fight and we want your support. Summer residents and visitors alike should voice their concerns. Educate yourself this Sunday, May 25th at The Inn on Newfound Lake from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. It’s a critical information update meeting. Everyone is welcome. There is no charge to attend this event.

I hope to see you all there! Bring a friend…

Ray Cunningham
Bridgewater