Carmen Krogh speaking at University of Waterloo….Wed. May 7th – 3:30 pm

Carmen Krogh | Harm from Wind Turbines: What Has Been Known for DecadesExport this event to calendar

Wednesday, May 7, 2014 – 3:30 pm

Harm from Wind Turbines, What has been known for Decades. A review of research on the effects of Low Frequency/Infrasound on people and animals.

The topic of adverse health effects associated with wind facilities is globally debated. It is acknowledged that if placed too close to residents, industrial wind turbines can negatively affect the physical, mental and social well-being of some. In addition to the general population, at risk are the vulnerable such as fetuses, babies, children, elderly and those with pre-existing medical conditions. There is published research on the effects of Low Frequency/Infrasound (LFI) on people and animals dating back several decades. This presentation will provide some of the available evidence drawn from peer reviewed literature, authoritative references, and other sources.

It is proposed that known risk of harm can be avoided by siting wind facilities a protective distance from residents.

Bio:

Carmen Krogh is published in peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals and has presented papers at scientific noise conferences. She is an independent, full time volunteer and for almost 6 years has researched health and other effects associated with industrial wind energy facilities and shares information with individuals, communities, authorities, wind energy developers, industry and others.  Krogh’s background in health care, vigilance monitoring, editing and publishing helps inform her work. She held senior positions at a major teaching hospital; as a drug information researcher; a professional association and the Health Protection Branch of Health Canada (PMRA). She is a former Director of Publications and Editor-in-chief of the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (CPS), the book used by physicians, nurses, and health professionals for prescribing information on prescription medication in Canada. Her goal is evidence-based siting of IWTs that protects human health.

Location
DC – William G. Davis Computer Research Centre

Room 1302
200 University Avenue West

WaterlooON N2L 3G1

Canada
Map data ©2014 Google

Map
Satellite
200 m

Kind of hard to accuse animals of suffering from “nocebo effect”…..but I’m sure they’ll try!

Re: Wind turbine noise

22 April 2014

Ladies and gentlemen sorry to get to the debate 2 years late, but I hope you find my contribution worthy. (1)

When it comes to psychogenic illness, it seems unlikely it is an illness that affects animals. This paper was published in 2013 from Poland, if I may quote. (2)

“The study consisted of 40 individuals of 5-week-old domestic geese Anser anser f domestica, divided into 2 equal groups. The first experimental gaggle (I) remained within 50 m from turbine and the second one (II) within 500 m. During the 12 weeks of the study, noise measurements were also taken. Weight gain and the concentration of cortisol in blood were assessed and significant differences in both cases were found.

Geese from gaggle I gained less weight and had a higher concentration of cortisol in blood, compared to individuals from gaggle II. Lower activity and some disturbing changes in behavior of animals from group I were noted. Results of the study suggest a negative effect of the immediate vicinity of a wind turbine on the stress parameters of geese and their productivity.”

In Portugal a study from Portugal suggested that foals born near wind turbines developed Equine Flexural Limb Deformities.

Also “Biologist Dr. Lynne Knuth, in a letter to the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, testified as follows: “The problems with animal reproduction reported in the wind farms in Wisconsin are lack of egg production, problems calving, spontaneous abortion (embryonic mortality), stillbirth, miscarriage and teratogenic effects:

In chickens: Crossed beaks, missing eyeballs, deformities of the skull (sunken eyes), joints of feet/legs bent at odd angles.

In cattle: missing eyes and tails (updated Excerpts from the Final Report of the Township of Lincoln Wind Turbine Moratorium Committee).”” (4)

There is more here. (5)

In conclusion it is possible in humans wind farm illnesses could be psychogenic. In animals it maybe a bridge too far.

1. http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e1527

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597302

3. https://www.repository.utl.pt/bitstream/10400.5/4847/1/Deforma%C3%A7ao%2…

4. file:///C:/Users/DaveA/Downloads/viewdoc.htm

5. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/62126

Competing interests: Freedom2Choose (F2C) are mainly known as a smoker’s rights group. I and our organisation have never received money, expenses or grace and favour from tobacco companies or agents. However I have been paid and remunerated by Pfizer who make smoking cessation drugs.

Dave Atherton, Chairman

Freedom2Choose, Flat 2 Wellington Passage, London E11 2AL

Open Letter from Victims of Wind Turbine Syndrome…

Steven N Luann Therrien
Steven N Luann Therrien 9:31am Apr 21
To all who have put us in this home of torture.

My husband and I are getting physically and psychologically worse by the day.

My symptoms are starting to catch up to where my husbands were a year ago, now he just wants to stay in bed most of the day because laying down makes his head pound less.

Depression on top of everything.

I would most likely be in bed most of the time to shut out this injustice if we didn’t have children. Who by the way have dark circles under eyes EVERYDAY! No…. We are not up all night, lastnight we went to bed at 9 and that is late for us. We hardly go anywhere and rarely have visitors, so all common conclusions go out the window.

IT IS WELL PAST TIME THAT ONE OR ALL WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR INFLICTING THIS TORTURE ON US STEP FORWARD AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT!!!! RELOCATE US!!!!

We have a right to a happy and healthy life out of harms way from this Industrial Wind Power Plant. We did not oppose the project because we had no idea. Now our ignorance and other peoples greed is costing us our health and well being.

Does not need to be called a buy out, we quite frankly do NOT CARE what spin is put on it. A pity fund, shut them up fund, lets move them to a better home fund, relocation fund, call it anything! We are not asking for a fortune, we simply need to move from here.

Tortured daily in Sheffield,

Steve, Luann , Seager & Baily Therrien

Wind Company buys home of people suffering from wind turbines!

Steven N Luann Therrien 7:11am Apr 17
4/15/2014 Wind Opponents Call The Nelsons Heroes, Predict More Buyouts Robin Smith Staff Writer

Wind opponents from across Vermont reacted to the settlement between Green Mountain Power and Don and Shirley Nelson of Lowell on Monday, calling them heroes.

They said they hope the buyout could spur more as the state begins to realize that industrial wind projects have an impact on human neighbors and they vowed to continue fighting them.

Luann Therrien of Sheffield, who also lives near industrial wind turbines, said she cried for joy when she heard the news that the Nelsons had struck a deal and would be paid for their property.

“We are so thrilled for them. We are so excited that they can get out and get healthy,” she said.

Her husband Steve said he had been to the Nelsons’ farm and understood their experience. “I wouldn’t have wanted to be there another day,” he said.

Therrien said he hoped that this settlement creates a pathway for others who are experiencing health impacts.

They have tried for years to get First Wind to purchase their property.

Steve Wright of Craftsbury, president of Ridge Protectors, said the Nelsons had the Vermont dream, until they were forced from their land by a foreign-owned corporation.

“Yes, they were paid for that property, but money runs a poor second to beauty, peace, quiet and a love for your land.

“Don and Shirley are heroes. They represent the long-held Vermont values that live on in the struggle for an energy policy we know is possible, one that doesn’t drive people from their homes, damage their health, and wither hope.

“The Nelsons are not the only ones forced off their land; already, at least three other families near the Lowell project have experienced a similar fate. More are expected,” Wright said.

Annette Smith of Vermonters for a Clean Environment said her group supports the Nelsons’ decision to agree to a settlement.

“At the same time, we and many others in the community know that they have been damaged by Green Mountain Power far beyond what any monetary settlement could provide,” Smith stated.

“Any time a utility has to buy out a neighbor, it is not a ‘win’ for the corporation.”

“We expect this is just the beginning of litigation and settlements … ,” Smith stated.

“We at Energize Vermont are saddened that the Kingdom Community Wind tragedy has driven Don and Shirley Nelson from their home,” executive director Mark Whitworth of Newark said.

GMP’s settlement “represents just the latest in the series of unanticipated costs” from the wind project that will be passed on to consumers “who are weary of hearing about the cost-effectiveness of wind-generated electricity,” Whitworth stated.

Neighbors are being hurt, Wright said, even though industrial wind projects have “no effective climate change benefit.”

“Industrial wind technology does not work on the New England landscape and the Lowell Project, in spite of GMP’s claims, is clear proof,” he said.

“Complicit in this sad tale is the Shumlin administration, aided and abetted by the so-called ‘environmental’ community. Together, they continue to advance statewide energy policy that even the Public Service Board acknowledges worsens Vermont’s carbon footprint,” Wright stated.

“The negative impacts of the Lowell turbines are far greater than Green Mountain Power has disclosed and the benefits to society that they promised will never be realized,” Whitworth stated.

“The turbines will have no impact on global climate change. Their damage to the land is permanent,” Whitworth stated.

“Wind energy generation is simply inappropriate for Vermont,” Smith stated.

“It does not live up to the promises of ‘free fuel,’ but instead comes at tremendous and unaccounted-for costs. The harm done to the Nelson’s property which now has no value in the real estate market, to Don and Shirley’s health and quality of life which is degraded on a daily basis, and to the wildlife, water resources and landscape are evidence that big wind turbines have no place in Vermont,” Smith stated.

The Nelsons will remain “a symbol to the rest of Vermont” of the sacrifices demanded of those who are forced to live near wind turbines. “In the end, we believe the Lowell wind turbines must come down,” Smith said.

“The Nelsons are not the only Vermonters who have suffered ill health and financial damage because of industrial wind turbines,” Whitworth stated.

“We call upon Green Mountain Power, First Wind, and Georgia Mountain Community Wind to make reparations to the other Vermont victims of their industrial wind projects.

Steve Therrien said he has asked First Wind three times to buy them out.

They have tried to find an attorney who would work for free to help them sue the developer but have not been successful.

Why I’m cheering for fossil fuels this Earth Day

“The heavens reek, the waters below are foul … we are in a crisis of survival.” That’s how Walter Cronkite and CBS hyped the first Earth Day, back in 1970. Somehow we’ve survived since then, and most of life got better, although I never hear that from the worrywarts. Of course, some things got better because of government: We passed environmental rules that got most of the filth out of the air and sewage out of lakes and rivers. Great — but now we’re told that we’re in big trouble because greenhouse gases cause global warming. I mean, climate change.

Time and again, environmentalists oppose the energy production most likely to make the world cleaner and safer. Instead, they persuade politicians to spend billions of your dollars on symbolism like “renewable” energy.

“Crop yields are down, deaths from heat are up,” says the Los Angeles Times. The “Worst Is Yet to Come,” warns The New York Times. This hype is not new. Alarmists always fool the gullible media. They once fooled me. A few years back, we were going to be killed by global cooling, overpopulation, pesticide residues, West Nile virus, bird flu, Y2K, cellphone radiation, mad cow disease, etc. Now it’s global warming. Reporters don’t make these scares up. The recent hype about global warming comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Most of its members are serious scientists. But reporters don’t realize that those scientists, like bird flu specialists, have every incentive to hype the risk. If their computer models (which so far have been wrong) predict disaster, they get attention and money. If they say, “I’m not sure,” they get nothing. Also, the IPCC is not just a panel of scientists. It’s an intergovernmental panel. It’s a bureaucracy controlled by the sort of people who once ran for student council and are “exhilarated by the prospect of putting the thumb of the federal government on the scale.” Actually, that wasn’t a quote from a global warming alarmist. It’s from anti-marijuana alarmist and former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Joe Califano. But it’s the same crisis mindset. Scientists who disagree, who are reluctant to put their thumbs on the government scale, don’t feel welcome in the IPCC. It’s possible climate change may become a problem. But even if industrialization brings warming, we’ve got more important problems. On my TV show this week, statistician Bjorn Lomborg points out that “air pollution kills 4.3 million people each year … We need to get a sense of priority.” That deadly air pollution happens because, to keep warm, poor people burn dung in their huts. Yet, time and again, environmentalists oppose the energy production most likely to make the world cleaner and safer. Instead, they persuade politicians to spend billions of your dollars on symbolism like “renewable” energy. “The amazing number that most people haven’t heard is, if you take all the solar panels and all the wind turbines in the world,” says Lomborg, “they have (eliminated) less CO2 than what U.S. fracking (cracking rocks below ground to extract oil and natural gas) managed to do.” That progress occurred despite opposition from environmentalists — and even bans in places like my stupid state, New York, where activists worry fracking will cause earthquakes or poison the water. Do environmentalists even care about measuring costs instead of just assuming benefits? We spend $7 billion to subsidize electric cars. Even if America reached the president’s absurd 2015 goal of “a million electric cars on the road” (we won’t get close), how much would it delay warming of the Earth? “One hour,” says Lomborg. “This is a symbolic act.” Symbolic. Environmentalism is now more religion than science. It even comes with built-in doomsday stories to warn people about what will happen if they disobey — a bit like the movie “Noah” that’s in theaters now. While environmentalists lament that our time is running out, environmental indicators get better, technological improvements reduce carbon dioxide, water gets cleaner for millions, and human life expectancy goes up. This Earth Day, instead of attacking those who sell fossil fuels, I will applaud them for overcoming constant environmental hysteria — while providing affordable energy that will allow us to fight poverty, which is the real threat to the people of the world.   John Stossel joined Fox Business Network (FBN) in 2009. He is the host of “Stossel” (Thursdays at 9 PM/ET), a weekly program highlighting current consumer issues with a libertarian viewpoint. Stossel also appears regularly on Fox News Channel (FNC) providing signature analysis.

Climate Alarmists Have an Agenda…..and it is NOT a Good One!

HOW THE IPCC MANIPULATES SCIENCE TO PROVE GLOBAL WARMING

Kevin Mooney — Capital Research Center– April 15, 2014

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
How a U.N. group manipulates science to “prove” Global Warming (pdf here)
By Kevin Mooney

Summary: The most prestigious international group claiming we face a global warming crisis has a history of twisting the scientific evidence involved in the controversy. It is so duplicitous that it has even misrepresented the findings of its own reports.

Why do so many people believe in Global Warming theory? Global Warming theory isn’t just that the earth is getting warmer, any more than the theory of evolution is that things evolve or the theory of relativity is that everything is relative. There’s a lot more to it than just warming.

Global Warming theory (sometimes fudged as “climate change” theory), in the words of Green Watch editor Steven J. Allen, is “that the earth as a whole is getting catastrophically warmer due not to natural causes but to ‘greenhouse gas’ emissions—especially carbon dioxide (CO2)—from human industry, transportation, and energy generation, and that the looming catastrophe of Global Warming can be averted with policies that are compatible with peace, prosperity, freedom, and democracy.”

That’s a lot of believe, and it’s inconsistent with what we know about both physical science and human behavior.  Continue reading here…..

A-Year-After-UK-Bribery-Act-2010-How-does-Translation-Play-a-Role

Ireland’s Wind Energy Policy brings out 2000 protesters!

Thousands protest over wind and energy policy

Tuesday 15 April 2014 23.03

1 of 4
The march ended outside Leinster House
The march ended outside Leinster House
The march ended outside Leinster House

Thousands have protested in Dublin city centre against the Government’s wind energy and pylons policy.

Organisers claim up to 4,000 people attended the march, which began at the Garden of Remembrance and ended outside Leinster House.

The protest was organised by Wind Aware Ireland, a new group combined of organisations against pylons and overhead power cables and those opposed to wind farms.

With increasing alarm over climate change in recent weeks, Ireland’s energy policy is under scrutiny like never before.

The matter is of acute political significance in many parts of the country as the Local Elections approach.

News that a wind energy export deal with Britain was off the table has done little to reduce concerns.

Environmental campaigners are calling for the Government to encourage communities to take ownership of future wind energy plans.

Meanwhile, the Government has set a tentative date of later this year for publishing its Climate Bill.

Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform Brendan Howlin earlier said that Ireland faces particular challenges with regard to reducing its carbon footprint.

But, he said, Ireland needs a robust response to the issue of climate change.

Mr Howlin said Ireland’s agriculture sector would pose a challenge as it was not as intensive as others.

He said he believed that Ireland would hit its target of 40% renewable energy by 2020.

While there might be resistance in some sectors to this, he said, if people looked at the recent reports on climate change they would reflect that we need to do things differently.

The minister said that the Government is obliged to submit budget costings to the EU in April, but this was predicated on last year’s projections.

He said there were recent signs of new economic activity in the first quarter with more jobs, but the Government was currently working on last year’s projection of 2% growth.

He said there might be more growth than expected but the Government needed to be prudent.

Rural Ontario tirelessly fighting the Wind Fiasco!

East Oxford group files FOI for wind farm details

Joan KeithBy Jennifer Vandermeer, Norwich Gazette/IngersollTimes
NORWICH TOWNSHIP – The East Oxford Community Alliance wants to know how the Ministry of the Environment has been handling the Prowind Gunn’s Hill Wind Farm file. The alliance (EOCA) has filed Freedom of Information requests and asked the Ontario Ombudsman to look into it because of the number of changes that have been made to the project without due process for the public to participate.

Joan Morris, spokesperson for EOCA, said one issue is the “substantive changes” to the project since it was first filed with the MOE and considered complete and accurate. “A change to the project area was announced to the public only four days before the application was deemed complete by the Ministry on February 7, 2014,” Morris also said in a press release. “Apart from a cover page from the Ministry of Environment, none of the documents for public review and comment were modified to account for the changes.”Read article

A Thank You letter, from a strong, courageous Aussie, fighting for justice!

Melissa Ware: a heartfelt “thank you” to Chris Back, Alan Jones & Graham Richardson

Chris Back

Senator Chris Back – gets a note of thanks for standing up.

A few posts back we covered the fantastic Chris Back interview on Sky News with Alan Jones and Graham Richardson – where the Senator from Western Australia gave the wind industry and it’s parasites a terrific serve (see our post here).

One of Pac Hydro’s long-suffering neighbours at Cape Bridgewater – Melissa Ware – has written this heartfelt letter – setting out her appreciation of the work being done by Chris Back and Alan Jones to help bring an end to the greatest economic and environmental fraud of all time – as well as the entirely unnecessary harm caused to decent, hard-working rural people.

To Senator Back and Messrs Jones and Richardson,

Thank you Senator Back, Mr Alan Jones and Mr Richardson on Skynews for this interview informing people about the uselessness of wind facilities. You managed to convey a wide range of issues all Australians face living with wind farms and RET’s, Renewable Energy Targets.

The health effects on neighbours, including hosts, the higher electricity bills we’re all paying, the enormous subsidies paid annually by taxpayers for each turbine; and the fact that turbines are an inefficient and expensive source of power because wind is a limited and unreliable resource that doesn’t always blow. Simply put, when turbines and renewables don’t generate enough electricity to meet needs and demand, prices for energy soar that none of us can afford.

Creating an Australia which is no longer one of the cheapest energy countries, forcing manufacturers and businesses to close due to roll on carbon costs. Every day Australians are impacted yet we haven’t reversed carbon emissions and still rely on back-up coal to meet energy need.

Wind farm noise experienced here at Cape Bridgewater is covered up and Pacific Hydro present as having no idea what we residents are truly suffering from exposure to the many different wind farm sound emissions, the heard noises and unheard infrasound. Community Consultations held with Futureye for residents of Cape Bridgewater, by Pacific Hydro staff, is an attempt by this company to garner trust and be seen to be accountable following its apology to Cape Bridgewater residents in August 2013. An apology for screeching noises Pacific Hydro claimed to have fixed and are still occurring.

Pacific Hydro and the Glenelg Shire Council openly supports the VicWind Alliance, favouring wind energy, also claiming that despite complaints of health impacts near wind turbines, “there is no scientific evidence to show a connection”. See Portland Observer 4.April.2104, p5 ‘Wind Energy Petition launched at Cape Nelson’. There are more than 80 Professionals, such as Professor Salt, whom disagree with that statement. Many are requesting the AMA to apologise and retract their recent position statement claiming a similar view.

I am grateful to Senator Back for doing his research, for standing up to inform the facts, to declare he has been to a wind farm and actually heard them and that when the blades pass the towers there’s a peak noise (amplitude modulation) that wind farms cover up. I blinked away furious tears at the continual injustice we neighbours of wind farms endure from such continued omissions of fact.

Those condoning our suffering ‘wind turbine syndrome’ and wind energy nuisances can’t ignore an Australian Senator. They can’t say it’s in his head, can’t accuse him of ‘nocebo effect’ and can no longer dishonestly claim “turbines are no louder than the fridge”. With this Government committed to independent noise and health studies it’s time to stop fudging the data and making baseless statements when it’s not proven there are no health impacts and it is proven there is nuisance noise in our homes.

Mr. Jones is equally appalled that AGL interfered in health management two years ago, by sending a letter to 12 clinics in the Western District, including 2 in Portland referring wind farm effected patients back to AGL where they are insultingly informed there are no health impacts. It’s an outrage recently revealed in Parliament by Senator Madigan.

My main concern is for residents and workers in homes, aged care, kindergartens and schools in South Portland. Particularly for the students and staff at the Portland Bay Specialist School, about to be impacted by Stage 4 of the Portland Wind Energy Project, which will have bigger towers and turbines than already inflicted on Cape Bridgewater and Cape Nelson.

How is Pacific Hydro going to prevent harm to children with special needs known to be noise sensitive and overstimulated by noise?

William C. Mulvaney, Superintendent of Armstrong Schools in Illinois, has reported wind farm health issues, seehttp://www.windaction.org/posts/38759-illinois-school-superintendent-letter-turbine-noise-creating-health-problems-for-students#.U0To4o1–M8

Dr. Chrystella Calvert a Paediatrician in Canada has reported concerns about wind turbines and impacts on his patient Joey, whom has complex developmental issues. See http://waubrafoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Calvert-Dr-Chrystella.-Joey-Correia-and-Exposure-to-Wind-Turbines.pdf

Like so many mothers wanting to protect their children, Joeys mother Shellie Correia has to fight the Government on his behalf see;http://waubrafoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Correia-Shellie.-Real-People-are-Suffering.pdf

How can Staff and parents protect children in their care when Pacific Hydro allows suffering at Cape Bridgewater to continue for nearly six years without fixing low frequency noise, infrasound and vibration etc. problems which we Cape Bridgewater residents have been reporting since the wind farm started operating.

None of the Capes residents can continue to live and function in our homes as we did prior to the wind development. All effected families have either left semi-permanently or seek regular respite because of wind farm emissions. GP’s and Specialists have advised me to leave my home on the Cape due to impacts on my health. The banks valuer unofficially told me our house and land is unsellable due to the wind farms proximity. How many more people will continue to be ignored or told to move away or take a sleeping tablet? These issues may not be ignored without consequence.

These questions do not have to be answered as part of permit conditions but can Pacific Hydro guarantee no-one in Portland will be sleep deprived nor cause or exacerbate health conditions from their turbines? Have they actively warned people of heart health risks and possible impacts of the magnetic field on pacemakers near wind farms? Have they done proper noise studies pre-construction of Stage 4 where people live and work? Will they conduct proper noise studies showing the peaks and troughs of noise that people hear and the health impacting infrasound after commissioning? Have they already ‘gagged’ those living in close proximity to Stage 4?

Community funding, sustainability and promise of temporary work won’t address growing concerns about a wind industry that brutally divides and sickens previously strongly connected and quiet rural communities all around the world.

Melissa Ware
Cape Bridgewater
10.4.14

Melissa-Ware

There is a good reason why they don’t admit wind is useless! They are involved in it!

WYNNE’S BROTHER-IN-LAW THE NEW CEO OF EHEALTH, BUT HE ALSO HAS DEEP TIES TO THE WIND INDUSTRY

How deep does the corruption of this Liberal government go?  How great is their arrogance for making sure that their family and buddies make a fortune off the backs of Ontario taxpayers?

Turns out, not only has Kathleen Wynne’s brother-in-law been appointed the new CEO of EHealth, but he’s also on the Board of Directors for two renewable energy companies.  The chutzpah and corruption of this gang of thieves just knows absolutely no bounds.   He’s also been a lawyer for the past 30+ years.

It’s no wonder the fight against wind turbines seems so useless when the decks are stacked so high against the rural victims of these useless monster machines.

A Google search of his name — F. David Rounthwaite — reveals that his is on the B. o. D. for the following companies.

Grid Essence Inc.

and

Renewable Energy Developers.(Sprott Power Corp.)

From 1997 to 2010 he was a trustee of Northland Power Income Fund and was lead independent trustee in several transactions of that fund including its acquisition of Northland Power Inc. in 2009. Northland Power has several wind facilities in Ontario, Quebec and B.C.

The more layers you peel back on this disgusting obscenely corrupt government the more it reeks.  They need to be removed from office now.

Thanks to a fellow reader at the Toronto Sun for digging up this information.

Alstom-ECO110-turbine-LaGacilly