The “Gang-green”, would like to eradicate the Humans on this earth!

Marita on the Well Being of Humans

Some people are convinced that we have no business on this earth, and we have no right to use the resources–the planet should be some kind of park.

 I would disagree, at least until I am dead or demented. Marita explains how modern exploration and production processes are enviro- friendly. But these greenies are really people haters, no question. If somebody needs electricity in the 3rd world, better not violate some green idea of what’s right for mother Gaia. Guess what, Mother Gaia doesn’t exist, except in their true believer heads.

Marita’s essay for this week.

For immediate release: May 19, 2014

Commentary by Marita Noon

Executive Director, Energy Makes America Great Inc.

Contact: 505.239.8998, marita@responsiblenergy.org

Words: 1606

The liberty and energy connection

Following my appearance on the Daily Show, I’ve received emails and phone calls from people who don’t agree with my views about energy and the advantages America’s energy abundance provides—benefits that drive both progress and prosperity.

Some of the emails can’t be read in polite company, but one that can asked: “Please explain how energy from mountain top removal, fracking, and tar sands makes America great.” The word choices Greg selected tell me that he isn’t truly seeking enlightenment and is instead aiming to antagonize me. The next day, he sent another: “I have yet to hear back on this simple question. Please respond.”

It does seem like a simple question. One I should be able to answer in an instant. But I didn’t want to offer platitudes. I felt the question deserved a thoughtful answer. So, Greg, here you are.

I’ve spent the past couple of days at a conference on “Energy, Economics and Liberty.” There discussions took place on the energy debate, government’s role, market solutions, and the geo-politics of energy. About twenty men—all experts in various aspects of energy—attended. I wasn’t just the only female I was the only energy advocate. The topics brought Greg’s request to mind and the conversations helped form the answers.

One of the participants, Jim Clarkson, wrote an article titled: “The Shale Gas Paradigm,” in which he states: “Increased access to energy is a key to economic progress in the undeveloped world.” Similarly, in my book, Energy Freedom, I quote Robert Bryce, author of Power Hungry, who says: “Electricity is the energy commodity that separates the developed countries from the rest. Countries that can provide cheap and reliable electric power to their citizens can grow their economies and create wealth. Those who can’t, can’t.”

Senate Major Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) once said: “Oil and gas are making us sick.” But I contend that they—along with coal—are the very things keeping us well. In Energy Freedom’s introduction, I point out: “Energy saves lives. When fire strikes or hurricanes are bearing down upon a city, it is energy—in this case in the form of gasoline—that allows people to drive away and escape death. … When weather is extreme, it is energy—usually in the form of electricity (most frequently from coal or natural gas)—that keeps people alive. Air conditioning allows people to live in comfort in Arizona in the summer. Heating keeps people from freezing to death in Alaska in the winter. Energy keeps us well. Energy makes us comfortable.”

The Energy, Economics and Liberty conference was hosted by the Liberty Fund. On its website, it offers this definition of liberty: “the beginning and the source of happiness from which all beneficial things flow in return.” Much like liberty, energy is the source from which many beneficial things flow. Energy has been a source of America’s freedom, a big part of what has made America great.

The conflicts in Ukraine have made the importance of energy freedom clear. Because of being on the Daily Show talking about fracking, I’ve been given other opportunities to address the topic. One was with former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura for his show Off the Grid. At the end of the twenty-minute interview, he asked me for closing comments. I said something like: “Because of fracking, OPEC would never be able to use energy as a weapon as it did to America in 1973 and as we see Russia doing to Ukraine today.”

Greg’s email to me used terms that lead to three different energy sources: coal, natural gas, and oil—and each have been big contributors to America’s progress and prosperity. Each has made the personal lives of Americans more pleasant and less painful. Together these energy sources have made America energy secure.

The email used the term “mountain top removal,” which is a method by which coal can be mined. It is safer than underground mines because it removes the risk of mine accidents, the horror of which we’ve recently witnessed in Turkey. (Note: America has far more stringent mining regulations today than does most of the world.) Greg likely selected the term “mountain top removal” because it sounds harsh. In fact, in the mountainous regions of Eastern Kentucky and West Virginia, this surface mining process allows for hospitals, housing developments, shopping centers to be built—all which bring more economic development and much needed jobs.

I’ve toured regions where “mountain top removal” is being done and stood on top of the massive coal seam. The procedure is amazing. Picture the region like lots of upside down ice cream cones next to each other. Hills and valleys—but no place to create a community. In that mountain is a thick layer of coal that goes all the way through the mountain, north to south, east to west. To access it, the dirt, the tip of the ice cream cone, is taken off and the coal is removed.

In the past, when the coal had been extracted, a private landowner could ask the mining company to level out the land—making it economically productive. However, today’s regulations take away that property owner’s rights and require that the mountain be rebuilt and put back to its original condition. If the landowner wants to turn his land into a housing development, he then has to incur the expense of, once again, removing the peak and leveling the land.

The coal provides, and has provided, America with low-cost, base-load electricity—which, as we’ve already addressed, has given us a competitive advantage in the global marketplace and unmatched personal progress. And, therefore, energy from mountain top removal makes America Great.

Fracking—short for hydraulic fracturing—combined with the amazing technology of horizontal drilling, has brought America into a new era of energy abundance. Clarkson states: “Gas using industries are expanding while we enjoy a distinct advantage over the rest of the world.” He explains: “Shale gas lay worthless beneath the earth’s surface for the whole of man’s previous existence until human intelligence made it valuable”—and that was done with fracking.

One of the definitions of liberty found at Dictionary.com is: “freedom from arbitrary or despotic government or control.” Clarkson points out: “There were no federal programs with subsidies, tax breaks, and mandated markets to favor the shale industry. …The new shale order of things is a triumph of free enterprise over government planning. The shale revolution shows that the good old American know-how and individual initiative that made this country great have survived the burden of big government and can still create economic miracles.” Clarkson closes with: “Some observers are already calling this the century of natural gas. This could also be the century of prosperity, free markets, and optimism as America regains its energy mojo.”

Unlike the pariah Greg presumes fracking to be, it is responsible for the shale gas phenomenon.

Last, Greg asked about tar sands and how they make America great. Tar sands, or oil sands, allow America to get oil from our friendly Canadian neighbor and reduce our need to import OPEC’s oil. We then refine that oil into gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel that fuels our transportation fleet—something that wind and solar power cannot do.

I have been to the oil sands of Canada and what they are doing there is, like fracking and horizontal drilling, a technological miracle.

If you have ever walked on a California beach and stepped on a tar ball (created when the oil seeps out of the ground and is washed ashore mixed with sand), you have a clue what the tar sands are like. The naturally occurring tar sands are a layer in the earth (much like coal). This layer has raw crude oil mixed with the dirt/sands. I recall driving to the tar sands from the town where we stayed. As the elevation increased, I noticed that trees reached a certain height and then died. It was explained that as soon as the roots hit the bitumen (or tar) it kills the tree.

At the extraction site, the tar sands are bulldozed and dumped into giant trucks (much like surface coal mining). The tar and sand mixture is processed to separate the oil and the sand. (Think of taking that tar ball from the beach and boiling it. The oil melts and floats while the sand drops to the bottom.) The oil is now available for use and the clean sand is put back into the earth—only now the trees can actually grow. The reclaimed land is teaming with wildlife that lives in the healthy forest the extraction process provides. As a result, when the Keystone pipeline is approved, America would be far less dependent on people who aim to do us harm and OPEC couldn’t cause an instant recession as it did in 1973. Plus, Keystone will be safer and cheaper—not to mention creating more jobs—than shipping the oil via rail as we are currently doing.

And that, Greg, is how tar sands can make America greater.

Yes, mountain top removal—or coal; fracking—or natural gas; and tar sands—or oil, make America great. The use of natural resources are a part of liberty: “freedom from control, interference, obligation, restriction, hampering conditions, etc.; power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, etc., according to choice.”

People like Greg want to interfere, restrict, and hamper North America’s energy abundance—which will take away America’s ability to provide cheap and reliable power to her citizens and take away the ability to grow the economy and create wealth. Why would anyone want to do that?

The author of Energy Freedom, Marita Noon serves as the executive director for Energy Makes America Great Inc. and the companion educational organization, the Citizens’ Alliance for Responsible Energy (CARE)

More Proof, that Wind Turbines can Harm the Health of Nearby Residents!

Wind Study to be Published

Sunday, May 18, 2014 12:08 PM by Matt Villeneuve
MOH report that links turbines to health issues will be published in academic journal.

(Grey Bruce)– 

The Wind Turbine Study completed by the Grey-Bruce Medical Officer of Health and Sudbury based researcher Doctor Ian Arra has been accepted for publication in an academic journal.

Cuerus — a peer-reviewed journal managed by academics from Stanford University, the University of Chicago, John Hopkins, the American Medical Association — has accepted the document following an external review.

In an email, Doctor Arra says only minor adjustments will be made to the paper.

MOH Doctor Hazel Lynn tells Bayshore Broadcasting News the study was fairly comprehensive, prompting its submission for the peer-review process.

And she says the Cuerus journal is a creditable international organization.

Dr. Lynn and Dr. Arra’s report found that there is a link between wind turbines and specific health concerns, such as headaches and sleeplessness.

The report — which analyzed other peer-reviewed studies — was presented last February to the Grey-Bruce Board of Health, and was then submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Health.

 

 

 

Liberals believe Others Should Learn from Lib’s Mistakes…But the Libs never did!

ONTARIO LIBERALS CAN’T HELP THEMSELVES,

IT’S IN THEIR DNA TO LIE!

 from Donna Quixote

(Editor’s note:  Hudak never said that he was going to rip up existing wind and solar contracts.  He specifically said that he would not approve any more contracts because we have too much electricity in this province now.  I wish that these liars would spontaneously combust every time they opened their mouths. — DQ)

Brad Duguid Rips PC Plan for Wind and Solar Contracts 

Antonello Artuso — Toronto Sun — May 18, 2014

TORONTO – Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak has learned nothing from Liberal government mistakes made in the billion-dollar gas plants controversy.

That was the unusual message from Liberal MPP Brad Duguid, who said Hudak is about to waste 20 times as much public money if he proceeds with his plans to tear up solar and wind power contracts.

“Ontarians should be asking Tim Hudak whether he’s learned from the mistakes that were made during the gas plants issue,” Duguid said Sunday. “We certainly as a government have. We’ve taken a number of measures to make sure that doesn’t happen again.

“Tim Hudak, though, in his plan, would repeat the same darn mistake again, costing us tens of billions of dollars.”

The former energy minister said that people understand that governments and politicians make mistakes — as was done in the case of siting two gas plants in residential neighbourhoods without adequate public consultation — but expect that lessons will be learned and not repeated.

Ontarians will fork over up to $1.1 billion extra over the next couple of decades for reneging on two signed gas plant contracts for Oakville and Mississauga.

Continue reading AND leave a comment here…..

mcginty

Liberals Greed Energy Scam is Destroying Our Energy System Entirely!

Figuring out Ontario’s energy future

1
Figuring out Ontario's energy future

OTTAWA, ON. APRIL 4, 2014 — Gary MacDonald’s message was clear: “Fix Hydro Now!” which received dozens of car honks from passing traffic. About 300 people gathered outside Liberal Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli’s office on Carling Avenue Friday to protest rising energy prices. (Julie Oliver/Ottawa Citizen) #116634.

Photograph by: JULIE OLIVER , Ottawa Citizen

Electricity in Ontario is so expensive because generations of governments have treated it as a tool of politics and for intervening in the economy, none of the major parties contesting the current election is going to stop, and nobody, but nobody, will cut your hydro bill meaningfully.

We call it “hydro” but that’s already misleading: Ontario’s electricity is mostly nuclear. Last year almost twice as much of Ontario’s energy came from nuclear reactors as from all other sources put together. Why? Because in the 1950s and ’60s, our governments thought they could kickstart an international export business by developing Canadian nuclear reactors. We sold a few, but to this day hardly anybody in the world uses CANDU reactors but us.

“I see energy as an economic fundamental and not a plaything,” Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak told the Citizen’s editorial board this week. Hudak says the government’s priority should first be to make sure Ontario’s power supply is reliable and, after that, as cheap as possible.

If he didn’t treat energy as a plaything, he’d be the first premier who didn’t.

Supply, at a price

Ontario’s energy supply is in better shape than when the Liberals took office in 2003: Nuclear reactors have been refurbished, new generating stations have been built, old coal plants have been all but wiped out, and we consistently generate more energy than we need. The Liberals crow about all those things and they aren’t wrong.

But they came at a big, big cost. The average price of electricity so far this year is the highest it’s ever been. Usually electricity is most expensive in summer, but according to the agency that monitors Ontario’s power system, the Independent Electricity System Operator, the price this past March was more than double what it was last July — more expensive than it’s been in any June, July or August since 2005, in fact, when the system was at its most delicate and we were buying power from anywhere we could.

The price is going to keep going up. The Liberals’ own long-term energy plan, a government document, predicts the total cost of Ontario’s electricity supply will keep increasing until 2022 before it stabilizes — but even then, it will be more expensive than it is today.

The Liberals have invested heavily in a power grid that was in dangerously ramshackle condition when they took it over. For decades nobody wanted to face up to the reality that Ontario Hydro was dysfunctional and was neither charging nor spending enough; the Tories under Mike Harris and Ernie Eves recognized there was a crisis in the 1990s and broke it up into smaller Crown corporations and agencies, but they hadn’t got around to renovating power plants and replacing power lines.

That was overdue work, it was expensive, and the Liberals kept on with it.

But they also got cocky, investing heavily in wind and solar power — billions of dollars’ worth — to try to kickstart a domestic green-energy industry.

The great green experiment

The Liberals’ green-energy policy has run over local governments by taking away cities’ and towns’ authority over new wind and solar farms. You can hardly drive along any rural highway in Ontario without seeing a billboard, placards on fences, makeshift signs on stakes damning the Liberals for ruining the countryside with wind farms.

Australian Renewable Energy Agency, On the Chopping Block!

Government axes renewable energy agency.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Broadcast: 15/05/2014

Reporter: Kerry Brewster

The government plans to axe the funding body for new technologies in renewable energy, ARENA the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, in order to save a billion dollars.

Transcript

TONY JONES, PRESENTER: The clean energy industry is voicing dismay over the Government’s plan to axe the key funding body for new technologies in renewable energy.

The dismantling of ARENA, the Australian Renewable Energy Agency will save more than a billion dollars. But ARENA says that money would have helped to build a $7.7 billion fleet of projects to develop solar, wave and geothermal technologies.

Kerry Brewster reports.

KERRY BREWSTER, REPORTER: Private investors in this solar demonstration plant in New South Wales say ARENA’s financial assistance was crucial.

ANDREW WANT, VASTSOLAR: Without support from ARENA for that private investment, helping absorb the risk, we would have had no option but to go offshore and try to access similar sorts of grant facilities overseas. We didn’t want to do that. We wanted to develop this technology in Australia for Australian markets.

KERRY BREWSTER: But Andrew Want says his dream of large solar thermal plants powering the nation’s cities has been dashed, with the Abbott Government announcing it will axe the Australian Renewable Energy Agency. 

According to the Treasurer, $1.3 billion in savings will go towards repairing the budget and funding policy priorities.

ANDREW WANT: Why Australia would want to send investment signals saying, “We are shut for business,” is beyond me.

KERRY BREWSTER: Solar businesses agree.

MARK TWIDELL, SMA: Just at a time when funding is there for the development of the future technologies, we’re scaling it back.

KERRY BREWSTER: Mark Twidell sells German-made solar inverters, but he’s not sure there’ll be an Australian market to sell to.

MARK TWIDELLL: ARENA was supporting the Australian universities, the Australian researchers, the Australian small-to-medium enterprises, getting their products, getting their technologies in order so that they could compete in a global marketplace.

KERRY BREWSTER: ARENA’s CEO says Australia could be the loser if more than a billion dollars of support for world-leading scientific R&D ends.

IVOR FRISCHKNECKT, AUST. RENEWABLE ENERGU AGENCY: The University of NSW, the ANU, the University of Queensland, CSIRO, all have incredibly strong programs, many people working in this area, lots of intellectual property being exported, lots of foreign students coming in here to be educated in those programs. We risk losing that. We also risk losing the rollout, so essentially delaying our transition to a renewable energy future and having lower-cost energy technologies available.

KERRY BREWSTER: This week the International Energy Agency said that for the world to meet its carbon reduction targets, 65 per cent of all power needed to be generated from renewable sources by 2050.

Energy specialist, journalist Giles Parkinson, says the race is on.

GILES PARKINSON, RENEW ECONOMY: I watch very carefully what’s going on in the rest of the world. I’ve been to Germany, I’ve been to other parts of Europe, I’ve been to the US. They’re all going fast forward on this and in Australia the rhetoric seems to be that nobody else is doing anything and nor should we, but it’s just not true. In the US they’re investing billions and billions of dollars.

KERRY BREWSTER: Andrew Want says he won’t be in the race if there are no ARENA funds to help attract further private investment.

ANDREW WANT: Investors in Europe, in the States, in Japan are thoroughly confused by why Australia is trying to shut down renewable energy.

KERRY BREWSTER: Mark Twidell, who ran the seed funding body that preceded ARENA predicts a renewable energy brain drain.

MARK TWIDELLL: We will see good technologies, good ideas, good companies seeking to go to other countries in the world and we’ll see those companies that were thinking about installing renewables perhaps starting to think again.

KERRY BREWSTER: The Government must pass legislation to abolish the agency, so its fate rests with the Senate. Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane told Lateline his department will focus on bringing to fruition the 180 research and development projects that have already received close to $1 billion of ARENA investments. 

Kerry Brewster, Lateline.

Time to Put an End to the Renewables Scam!

End to solar farm blight as subsidy scheme is scrapped

Green energy subsidy scheme will be shut to large solar farms as ministers attempt to curb blight to countryside

Subsidies for solar panels will be scrapped to help reduce household electricity bills, energy minister in charge of climate change has declared


Subsidies that have driven the spread of large solar farms across Britain are to be scrapped under plans to stop the panels blighting the countryside.

Energy companies that build solar farms currently qualify for generous consumer-funded subsidies through the so-called ‘Renewable Obligation’ (RO) scheme, and had expected to keep doing so until 2017.

But the Department of Energy and Climate Change announced on Tuesday that it planned to shut the RO to new large solar farms two years early, from April next year.

The decision follows an admission by ministers that far more projects have been built than expected, leading to a rising subsidy bill for consumers and increasing local opposition.

Greg Barker, the energy minister, pledged last month that solar farms must not become “the new onshore wind” and said he wanted solar panels installed on factory rooftops instead.

A Whitehall source said: “Large scale solar shouldn’t be in any place or at any cost. The direction of travel is away from farms – especially where communities don’t want them.”

Leonie Greene, head of external affairs for the Solar Trade Association, said the industry was “dismayed” at the proposals.

She said that the replacement subsidy scheme – so-called ‘contracts for difference’ (CfD) – simply “doesn’t work for solar”.

The new scheme will have a capped budget and onshore wind and solar farm projects will be forced to compete with each other in reverse auctions to win subsidy contracts.

Ms Greene said that, on current costs, solar farms “can’t compete with onshore wind”. The uncertainty in the auction process also made solar farm development too risky for the small businesses who typically build them.

“Unless we can get major amendments to CfDs and fair treatment, they [large-scale solar farms] won’t get built,” she said.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change said: “Large-scale solar is deploying much faster than we expected. Industry projections indicate that, by 2017, there could be more solar deployed than is affordable – more than the 2.4-4GW set out in the electricity market reform (EMR) delivery plan.

“We need to manage our financial support schemes effectively and responsibly. That means that we need to ensure that the growth of the solar sector is delivered in a way that gives best value for money to consumers and allows us to offer effective support to the renewables sector as a whole.

“So we are also consulting today on proposals to close the RO to new solar PV capacity above 5MW from 1st April 2015, across England, Wales and Scotland. Those proposals include grace period arrangements to protect developers who have already made significant financial commitments.”

In a solar strategy released last month, the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) said: “We want to move the emphasis for growth away from large solar farms.”

Seb Berry, head of public affairs at solar company Solarcentury, said: “Today’s announcement is unnecessary and totally at odds with the government’s desire to reduce the cost to energy bill payers of delivering the 2020 renewable energy target.

“This policy proposal will undermine investor confidence in the entire UK renewable energy sector, by removing at a stroke the short and medium-term policy certainty required for major project investments.

“It is surprising that the government is trying justify this proposal on cost grounds. Large-scale solar is already significantly cheaper than offshore wind and will be competitive with onshore wind by 2017. In deliberately setting out to strangle the growth of cheaper solar from 2015, Secretary of State Ed Davey can no longer claim that government policy will deliver the most cost-effective mix of technologies by 2020.”

Government Tries to Ram Projects Through, in Spite of Local Opposition!

Wind turbines project is a boondoggle!

Posted: Sunday, May 18, 2014 5:00 am

For the second time, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities has rejected a proposal to build five windmill turbines off the coast, in sight of our historic Atlantic City Boardwalk.

The Obama administration’s Department of Energy would have none of it, and has surreptitiously pledged $47 million of your dollars to pay a Chinese company, Xiangtan Electric Manufacturing Group, to build the project. The department doesn’t care if ordinary New Jerseyans are opposed to it, as long as Jeff Tittel, of the New Jersey Sierra Club, is on board.

Any casual observer of this administration’s forays into “green” energy can expect that the first kilowatt will not come ashore for years, if ever, and will cost American taxpayers several times the current project estimate of $188 million. Also, expect that any electricity, if actually delivered by the turbines, will cost multiple times what we pay PSE&G for a kilowatt hour. Not to mention the complete decimation of the birds that use the near-shore migration flyby.

One wonders why a Chinese wind turbine company isn’t busy building such projects in China. The answer is that the Chinese government isn’t interested in such energy boondoggles since it is, on average, building a coal-fired power plant every week to support its expanding economy. China leaves the “renewable energy” fiascoes to the West. It’s almost as big a hoax as “climate change,” also known as “global warming.”

After seven years, we can’t even get the Keystone XL pipeline turned on.

Eugene Boyle

First Nations Stops Approval from the M.O.E. for Wind Turbine Project!!!

Horizon Wind Farm Court Decision

Posted 16 May 2014 by  in Business
Great news for Thunder Bay!
The Fort William First Nation have stopped the Horizon Wind project on the grounds that the Province failed in its duty to consult.
This is the first time a First Nation has succeeded based on these grounds.
Amazing how an election gets their attention…
Maybe the Michipicoten FN and Curve Lake claims that they were not properly consulted will get some traction now, at least we can hope.



Horizon Wind has lost in their application to have the Ministry of the Environment give them approval for the wind farm... appears that Fort William First Nation wins this one...

Developing Story…Nor’Wester Old Growth Maple Forest

THUNDER BAY – BREAKING NEWS – Horizon Wind has lost in their application to have the Ministry of the Environment give them approval for the Big Thunder Wind Farm… appears that Fort William First Nation wins this one…

The original application was submitted in September 2012. In a news release the company states, “In 2007, Horizon Wind Inc. entered into an agreement with the City of Thunder Bay for the potential development of the Big Thunder Wind Park.

Horizon Director of Community Affairs Kathleen MacKenzie stated at the time, “Community members from Thunder Bay, the Municipality of Neebing and surrounding First Nation communities have been engaged in this process with us for several years now. We are hopeful that residents will be pleased with the REA submission and how it directly responds to their feedback. We have listened and consulted extensively and are now looking to move this project to the next step, working together with the community”.

FWFN Chief Explains Norwester Issue

 

 

Fort William First Nation repeatedly explained that their community had not been consulted.

Developing….

Sugar Maples

– See more at: http://www.netnewsledger.com/2014/05/16/horizon-wind-farm-court-decision/#sthash.mpBLdI4d.dpuf

No Coincidence that Wynne Supports Useless Wind! Her cronies are Invested In It!!!

WYNNE’S BROTHER-IN-LAW THE NEW CEO

OF E-HEALTH, BUT HE ALSO HAS DEEP TIES

TO THE WIND INDUSTRY

 

How deep does the corruption of this Liberal government go?  How great is their arrogance for making sure that their family and buddies make a fortune off the backs of Ontario taxpayers?

Turns out, not only has Kathleen Wynne’s brother-in-law been appointed the new CEO of EHealth, but he’s also on the Board of Directors for two renewable energy companies.  The chutzpah and corruption of this gang of thieves just knows absolutely no bounds.   He’s also been a lawyer for the past 30+ years.

It’s no wonder the fight against wind turbines seems so useless when the decks are stacked so high against the rural victims of these useless monster machines.

A Google search of his name — F. David Rounthwaite — reveals that he is on the B. o. D. for the following companies.

Grid Essence Inc.

and

Renewable Energy Developers.(Sprott Power Corp.)

From 1997 to 2010 he was a trustee of Northland Power Income Fund and was lead independent trustee in several transactions of that fund including its acquisition of Northland Power Inc. in 2009. Northland Power has several wind facilities in Ontario, Quebec and B.C.

The more layers you peel back on this disgusting obscenely corrupt government the more it reeks.  They need to be removed from office now.

Thanks to a fellow reader at the Toronto Sun for digging up this information.

Alstom-ECO110-turbine-LaGacilly

The Damage Being Done to Rural Ontario, is Outrageous!

APRIL 6, 2014 – TURBINE PROTEST AT THEDFORD BOG, ONTARIO

Part One

Part Tw0

Part Three

“Whole community is…one huge wind turbine, industrial area”