Wind Power? Wind = Powerless!

Wind Power Myths BUSTED

mythbusters2

As the Australian wind industry’s house of cards collapses, its parasites and paid spruikers – like the Clean Energy Council – have been working up a real sweat in their efforts to make a case for the retention of the mandatory Renewable Energy Target – upon which that house of cards entirely depends.

All manner of fictions are being relied upon, most of which we’ve all heard before – crackers like: wind power has REDUCED household power bills; wind power has created thousands of “green” jobs; wind power is cost competitive with conventional power generation sources; and that giant fans are literally sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere.

In this episode of STT Mythbusters, we thought we’d tackle 3 of the biggest myths peddled about wind power by its dwindling group of hard-pressed supporters.

Myth #1: “the distributed network myth”.

This is the often told tale about wind power providing “base-load” power (ie available on-demand and around-the-clock) when wind farms are spread over a large geographical area and connected to the same grid. This myth is based on the story that the “wind is always blowing somewhere” – spread fans far and wide and there will always be oodles of wonderful “free” wind power available on-demand.

Myth #2: “wind farms in Australia produce enough energy to power 1.7m homes”.

Variants of this myth pop up as: “the Woodlawn [insert name] wind farm will “power” 32,000 homes [or simply insert any made-up figure you like]” (see our post here).

Myth #3: “wind power is a substitute for fossil fuel generation sources”.

This myth is trotted out to support wild claims about wind power completely displacing coal and gas-fired power plants, thereby eliminating CO2 emissions in the electricity sector, altogether. This myth is tied up with Myth #1 – relying upon the myth that wind power provides “base-load” power. One lesser version of the myth is that wind power is capable of being a perfect substitute for coal and gas (some day) – provided that 10s of thousands of new giant fans are added to the grid.

At STT Mythbusters we don’t just tell the myths, we put them to the test. So let’s take a look at some data from the last month, courtesy ofhttp://windfarmperformance.info/.

In this episode, we’ll look at data for the entire Eastern Grid – which covers every wind farm in Victoria, Tasmania and New South Wales, as well as including the 1,203 MW of installed capacity that comes from Australia’s “wind power capital” – South Australia. All of these wind farms are connected to the Eastern Grid and together have a total installed capacity of 2,660 MW. Oh, and if our data looks a little fuzzy, click on the image, it will pop up in a new window, use your magnifier and it will look crystal clear.

Nat 16.4.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 16 April 2014 – from 8am to 12 noon (4hrs) and from 6pm to midnight (6hrs):

Total wind farm output: 8am to 12 noon – less than 165 MW, falling to 90 MW; 6pm to midnight – less than 80 MW, falling to less than 50 MW.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: 8am to 12 noon – 6.2%, falling to 3.3%; 6pm to midnight – 3%, falling to 1.9%.

Total demand (average): 22,000 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: 0.75%, falling to 0.22%.

Nat 17.4.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 17 April 2014 – from midnight to 11am (11hrs) and from 6pm to 9pm (3hrs):

Total wind farm output: midnight to 11am – less than 80 MW and generally less than 60 MW; 6pm to 9pm – less than 140 MW, falling to 80 MW.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: midnight to 11am – 3%, falling to 2.2%; 6pm to 9pm – 5.2%, falling to 3%.

Total demand (average): 22,000 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: midnight to 11am and 6pm to 9pm – between 0.27% and 0.63%.

Nat 19.4.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 19 April 2014 – from 8am to 1pm (5hrs) and from 7pm to 11pm (4hrs):

Total wind farm output: 8am to 1pm – less than 180 MW, falling to 90 MW; 7pm to 11pm – around 45 MW.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: 8am to 1pm – between 3.4%, and 6.7%; 7pm to 11pm – 1.7%.

Total demand (average): 19,000 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: 8am to 1pm and 7pm to 11pm – between 0.23% and 0.94%.

Nat 30.4.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 30 April 2014 – from 8am to midnight (16hrs):

Total wind farm output: 8am to midnight – never more than 380 MW, generally less than 300 MW, and falling to less than 40 MW (10pm to midnight).

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: 8am to 10pm – between 5% and 14%; 10pm to midnight – 1.5%.

Total demand (average): 23,500 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: 8am to midnight – between 0.17% and 1.62%.

Nat 1.5.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 1 May 2014 – from midnight to 10am (10hrs):

Total wind farm output: midnight to 10am – never more than 150 MW and generally less than 100 MW.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: midnight to 10am – between 3.75% and 5.6%.

Total demand (average): 23,500 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: midnight to 11am – between 0.42% and 0.64%.

Nat 6.5.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 6 May 2014 – from 10am to midnight (14hrs):

Total wind farm output: from 10am to midnight – never more than 280 MW, dipping to 210 MW around 3pm.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: from 10am to midnight – around 10.5%, dipping to 7.8% around 3pm.

Total demand (average): 23,500 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: 10am to midnight – between 0.89% and 1.2%.

Nat 11.5.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 11 May 2014 – from 4am to 4pm (12hrs); and 5pm to midnight (7hrs):

Total wind farm output: from 4am to 4pm – never more than 370 MW; from 5pm to midnight – never more than 240 MW, dipping to 130 MW around 11pm.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: from 4am to 4pm – around 14%; from 5pm to midnight – around 9%, dipping to 4.9% around 11pm.

Total demand (average): 21,500 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: 4am to midnight – between 0.60% and 1.72%.

Nat 12.5.14

Entire Eastern Grid – 12 May 2014 – from midnight to 7pm (19hrs):

Total wind farm output: (from midnight to 7pm) never more than 240 MW, generally less than 170 MW and dipping to around 100 MW between 5pm and 6pm.

Output as a percentage of total installed wind farm capacity: from midnight to 7pm – no more than 9%, generally around 6.4% and dipping to 3.8% around 5pm.

Total demand (average): 23,500 MW.

Contribution to total demand as a percentage: (from midnight to 7pm) between 0.42% and 1.02%.

For more STT Mythbuster’s data see our posts here and here and hereand here and here.

Now back to the workshop with the data to test the myths.

Myth #1: “the distributed network myth”.

Eastern grid3

On the Eastern Grid Australia’s wind farms are spread from: Jamestown in the Mid-North, west to Cathedral Rocks on lower Eyre Peninsula and south to Millicent in South Australia; down to Cape Portland (Musselroe) and Woolnorth (Cape Grim) in Tasmania; all over Victoria; and right up to Cullerin on the New South Wales Tablelands.

Those wind farms have hundreds of fans spread out over a geographical expanse of 632,755 km². That’s an area which is 2.75 times the combined area of England (130,395 km²) Scotland (78,387 km²) and Wales (20,761 km²) of 229,543 km².

Nowhere else in the world are so many interconnected wind farms spread over such a large geographical expanse. If there was a shred of substance to the distributed network myth, then we’d see it in the data above. But it just ain’t there.

When you have 2,660 MW of installed capacity – connected and spread over an area more than twice the size of Great Britain – producing less than 200 MW for hours on end – and, on plenty of occasions, less than half that figure – the idea that wind power is providing (or could ever provide) “base-load” power – or even power “on demand” – by having wind farms spread far and wide is just silly.

Verdict: Myth #1 – BUSTED.

Myth #2: “wind farms in Australia produce enough energy to power 1.7m homes”. 

True it is that, STT Mythbusters has only presented data from the Eastern Grid, overlooking the roughly 420 MW of installed wind farm capacity in Western Australia (which represents around 14% of the 3,080 MW Australian total). So let’s test Myth # 2 as a myth about “Eastern Australian wind farms “powering” 1.4 million homes.”

At STT Mythbusters the term “powering” means exactly what it says: that when someone – at any time – in any and all of those 1.4 million homes flicks the switch the lights go on or the kettle starts boiling.

The claim about wind farms powering 1.4 million homes depends upon all 2,660 MW of total installed capacity operating and pumping all of that power into the grid.

So, how many homes were, in fact, “powered” by wind farms on 12 May 2014 when – from midnight to 7pm (a period of 19 hours) – every single fan hooked up to the Eastern Grid never produced more than 240 MW, generally produced less than 170 MW and was producing about 100 MW around 5-6pm that day?

STT Mythbusters viewers can run the numbers on any of the data we’ve gathered, and get much the same results.

On rare and brief occasions – and then only for very short spurts – the installed wind farm capacity connected to the Eastern Grid has generated around 2,000 MW, but for the most part produces half that and much, much less.

Hundreds of times each year – for hours on end – those same wind farms collectively produce less than 5% of their installed capacity (see our post here). At the abstract level, that means that 70,000 homes (5% of 1.4 million) could be “powered” by output from wind farms. But that’s not what the myth says.

From the data seen above, there are long periods when actual output struggles to exceed more than 4% of total installed capacity, which completely demolishes Myth #2.

Verdict: Myth #2 – BUSTED.

Myth #3: “wind power is a substitute for fossil fuel generation sources”.

The data above kills this myth stone dead. Intermittent and unpredictable wind power output means that wind power is not – and can never be – a substitute for on-demand generation sources, which obviously includes gas and coal generators.

There are hundreds of occasions each year – like those seen in our data above – when, for hours on end – total wind farm output is less than 10% of installed capacity (or half that and less), but the power that householders and businesses need simply has to come from somewhere.

The alternative, of course, is for households to break out the candles and eat cold tins of baked beans while they wait for the wind to pick up. Some might see a wind power “blackout” as a good opportunity to defrost the deep freeze and everything in it. But every other day?

Widespread blackouts are relatively rare occurrences where a grid relies upon base-load gas and coal plants, with sufficient intermediate (on-demand) generating capacity to meet spikes in demand. A grid trying to rely upon wind power would collapse into chaos within 24 hours.

And it wouldn’t matter if there were 100,000 giant fans connected to the Eastern Grid – the result would be identical. As soon as the wind stops blowing, output plummets and – in the absence of coal and gas powered plants – every home and business would be plunged into silent darkness.

The critical point – as our data shows – is that wind power is not available “on-demand”; and never will be. It will never be a substitute for “on-demand” power sources, which – at the present time – in Australia means gas, coal and hydro power.

Verdict: Myth #3 – BUSTED.

bustedplacard-728291

 

ONE HUNDRED AND SIX…Compelling Reasons Not to Vote Liberal!

Just a few facts on the past 11, almost 12 years of Liberal government;

Green
Energy Act (20 billion)

eHealth scandal (almost 2
billion)

Gas
plant scandal (1.1 billion theft and cover-up of our tax
dollars)

Deleting
e-mails

ORNGE scandal (700
million)

Ontario Northland Railway
scandal (820 million)

Caledonia Hydro Line scandal
(116 million)

Lobbyist scandal (two
multi-million dollar scandals)

Eco-Fee Reversal scandal (18
million)

CancerCare Ontario scandal
(millions of dollars)

Slush Fund scandal (32
million)

Niagara Falls Commission
scandal

Ontario Power Generation
scandal

Children’s Aid Society
scandal

Nanticoke Coal Power Plant
Shutdown scandal

G20 Secretly Approved Police
Power scandal

Auto Insurance
scandal

Foreign Scholarships scandal
(our students pay the highest tuition in Canada while foreign students
get free university educations)

Offshore Wind Turbines
scandal

Samsung scandal
(sole-sourcing)

Pan Am scandal (cost increase
from 1.4 to 2.5 billion)

MPAC scandal (over and
under-valuation of properties)

OLG scandal (millions of
dollars)

Isotape Shortage
scandal

Chemotherapy Dosage
scandal

Payout for Pan Am CEO (250
million)

Trillium Wind Power and Sky
Power Limited lawsuit (500 million)

Cement company lawsuit (275
million) – Quarry outside Hamilton was scuttled for political
reasons

School bus service
lawsuit

Augusta/Westland lawsuit as it
pertains to ORNGE

Elliot Lake Collapse lawsuits
(two lives lost due to recovery delays)

Ontario Medical Association
lawsuits – applied to Superior Court alleging McGuinty not negotiating
in “good faith”

Breast Screening scandal
(ensuing lawsuits due to thousands of misread mammograms, one life
lost)

Class-action lawsuit for autism
funding cancellation

Over 650 new agencies, boards,
commissions and entities such as LHIN’s and CCAC’s

Over 300,000 new public servants
many of whom, are on the sunshine list

Public sector employment in
health care increased by 39%

Public sector employment in
social services increased by 39%

Public sector employment in
education increased by 34%

Paying more Liberal taxes only
to receive fewer services as taxes now being spent to pay the salaries
and perks of newly-assigned, Liberal-friendly public
servants

Gutted our manufacturing base
(job growth across Canada except in Ontario)

Nearly one million Ontarians now
out of work

Increased spending by 80% while
our economy grew by only 9%

More than doubled our debt to
288 billion

Running a 11.3 billion annual
deficit

Debt
servicing costs will rise from 11.4 billion today to 14.5 billion once
the debt exceeds 300 billion by 2017-18

Interest payments on our debt
now the third largest budget expenditure after health and
education

Task Force on Competitiveness,
Productivity and Economic Progress confirmed that McGuinty’s Green
Energy Act grossly underestimated the cost to consumers and
overestimated the number of new jobs that would be
created

Tax
collectors getting 45,000.00 severance packages for switching job titles
from provincial to federal

Two ministries under an OPP
criminal investigation – ORNGE and gas plant
scandals

Pharmacy war

Illegal green
taxes

Increased smart meter,
electricity, hydro, tuition and car insurance costs

Implemented tire tax,
electronics tax, eco fee, health premium (tax), WSIB tax increase, HST,
beer surtax

Failing grade on ADHD
education

Ranking the lowest of all
provinces for fiscal performance

Delisting eye exams,
physiotherapy, chiropractic care, diabetic strips,
etc.

Increasing wait time for
cataract surgery

No longer covered for eye exams
yet taxpayers paying for sex changes

Wait
time for nursing home bed tripled

Failure to disclose elevated
radiation levels

OES missed its collection and
recycling targets by 59%

Not correcting the foreign
ownership of our beer market

Acceptance of garbage striker
extortion

Harassing labour
inspectors

Kowtowing to green energy
lobbies

Imposing blood alcohol rules
that punish people who are not impaired

Public utilities donating to
Liberals

Voting to cover up the Niagara
Parks Commission scandal

Emergency room wait times not
meeting provincial targets

Put on notice by Standard and
Poor, credit rating downgraded, under a very serious credit
watch

Have-not province for the first
time in Canadian history

Borrowing more debt than any
province except NB

Dramatic cuts in health care
services in schools

Nurses getting bonuses despite a
wage freeze

Insufficient senior homecare
services

Failing grade of Family
Responsibility Office

Abstained from vote to
investigate CBC expenses

Cash kickback scheme involving
government cleaning contracts

Talked about a two-year freeze
on wages for public sector while previously giving the OPP a 5% wage
increase – the OPP received another raise of over 8% in January,
2014

Energy
now unaffordable yet we must pay Quebec and some north-eastern States to
take our surplus energy

Encouraging farmers to build
small-scale solar projects but having no way to connect them to the
power grid

Laid up in US hospital beds as
no beds available in Ontario

Refusing public inquiry into G20
fiasco

Giving those who hire only
newcomers a 10,000.00 tax credit

Third highest user of food
banks

Announced pay freezes knowing
that 38,000 were getting a 3% salary increase after the
election

Hiding hospital errors from the
public

Teachers skipping classes to
assist with anti-Conservative campaign

Failing grade in northern
forestry management

Almost 40 C. difficile deaths to
date

Loss of
6,500 cancer patient health records

Highest rent increase rate in
years

Ignoring evidence that wind
turbines can cause poor health

Workers at eHealth suing for not
receiving bonuses

Liam denied eye care that
another child is receiving under OHIP

Ontarians pleading for their
lives or dying because they aren’t getting the health care they
need

Lady
with a brain tumor denied help to cover costs which costs are covered in
Manitoba

Electricity rates to rise 42%
over five years

Prior loss of 60,000 jobs in the
horse racing industry – now attempting to correct
this

Presto

Ring of Fire

Cleaning kick-back scheme that
ended with the conviction of three persons (two of whom were employed by
Wynne’s ministry at the time …)

Muslim prayers allowed in our
publicly-funded school system while the Lord’s Prayer has been
banned

Tim Hudak refuses to Carry On with the Wind Scam! Windweasels will scurry!!!

Hudak vows to pull the plug on wind power

BY  ,QUEEN’S PARK BUREAU CHIEF

FIRST POSTED: MONDAY, MAY 12, 2014 05:24 PM EDT | UPDATED: MONDAY, MAY 12, 2014 05:50 PM EDT

Wind farm
Wind farms. (QMI files)

It’s time to blow off expensive subsidies to wind and solar power, PC Leader Tim Hudak says.

The Progressive Conservatives would, if elected to govern, refuse to sign any more renewable energy deals at high rates of return and focus on creating an electricity system reliant on gas, hydro operations and nuclear power.

A Tory government would also give more control to local municipalities over the siting of wind projects, he said.

“If people can have a say about a hot dog stand going in for a Canada Day celebration, shouldn’t they have a say about massive industrial wind turbines in their backyard?” Hudak said.

The PCs say they will not proceed with any wind or solar applications that have not been already approved.

Those projects that have been approved but not yet connected to the grid would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Such a move would save $20 billion and help businesses create 40,000 jobs through more affordable electricity — numbers confirmed by an independent economist brought in by the PCs, Hudak said.

The election campaign brought Hudak to Stanpac Inc. Monday, a food, dairy and beverage packaging manufacturer located in Smithville which is in the Niagara Region.

Murray Bain, Stanpac’s vice president of marketing, said the company would like to expand its Ontario operations but the rising cost of electricity in the province makes it more likely that those jobs will be added to its Texas plant.

“Every dollar we spend on energy could be a dollar that we would use for new jobs and higher pay cheques in Ontario,” Bain said. “We need to remember that government experiments that drive up energy costs will also end up taking jobs away. High energy prices are a self-inflicted wound on Ontario’s economy. It’s time to heal that.”

Premier Kathleen Wynne said Monday that her government has renegotiated a renewable energy deal with Samsung to find savings, but remains committed to its overall plan for renewable energy, including wind power.

Ontario’s green electricity initiatives had created 42,000 jobs by the end of 2013 in construction, installation, energy auditing, operations and maintenance, engineering, consulting, manufacturing, finance, information technology and software, the Liberals say.

Northern Ontario companies and lower income families benefit from government programs to keep their hydro costs manageable, Wynne added.

Hudak said the cost of hydro has gone up $630 a year for the average family under the Ontario Liberals.

 

More Proof that the Liberals are Scamming the Province!

Bett
      THE WYNNE VERSION OF ELECTRICITY RATE RELIEF
On April 24, 2014, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced that the Debt Retirement Charge (DRC), a 0.7 cent-per-kWh charge on Ontario electricity consumers, would be terminated at the end of 2015. The Premier described this as a move that would “bring significant rate relief”. Is this true?
As background, the 0.7 cent charge may sound small, but it isn’t. It collects about $900 million every year from Ontario electricity ratepayers. The charge was introduced in 2002 to pay for the “residual stranded debt” of the former Ontario Hydro. The original residual stranded debt, back in 1998, was $7.8 billion.
In the 2012 Ontario Budget, it was revealed that, up to March 31, 2012, the Ontario government (through the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation) had collected $12.8 billion dollars as a result of the debt retirement charge. In the fall 2013 Update, the Finance Minister reported that, although about $1.5 billion more had been collected to that point in time, the remaining residual stranded debt was $11.3 billion. So, after paying about $14.3 billion to retire a $7.8 billion debt, Ontario ratepayers still owed $11.3 billion. This amazing arithmetic is due to the Ontario government’s addition of interest to the original amount owing and its switching of certain costs incurred by Ontario Hydro’s successor companies unto the “residual stranded debt account”.
This is a story that the Ontario Auditor General may someday want to investigate. Let us return, however, to the claim that removing the DRC will result in significant rate relief.
By the end of December, 2015, the DRC will have collected $15.5 billion, so Ontario ratepayers will have paid almost double the original $7.8 billion owing.
Just one year ago, the Ontario Energy Board approved an electricity (i.e. commodity charge) rate increase that cost the average ratepayer $3.63 a month, or $44 annually. It followed that with another increase in November 2013 raising rates by $4.00 per month, or $48 annually. Then, on April 1, 2014, there was another increase of $2.83 per month, or $34 annually. Those increases did not include rate increases for the “delivery” or “regulatory” lines on our electricity bills, which also increased. So, in just one year, the electricity rates jumped $126 annually and Wynne’s announced rate relief won’t happen until the end of 2015.
2015 just happens to also be the year the Ontario Clean Energy Benefit (OECB) ends. The OECB reduces the average bill by $13.30 per month or $160 annually. Ontario’s taxpayers pay it, so it is a subsidy from residents’ right pockets to their left pockets. The average bill (electricity, or “commodity charge ” only) at the start of 2016 will thus be $286 higher on an annual basis than it was as of April 30, 2013. Adding the HST brings the increase to $323. There will also be further increases from the Ontario Energy Board’s scheduled rate setting onDecember 1, 2014, May 1, 2015 and December 1, 2015; those will add a minimum of $100 to homeowners’ electricity costs.
In other words, the average residential bill will have jumped by approximately $425 per year. That represents a 25% increase in electricity rates in two years before Premier Wynne’s “significant rate relief” of $160 per year occurs. Just as the DRC is ended, another scheduled charge from the recent announcement (aimed at reducing energy poverty) of $11 will be added.
By December 1, 2015, our electricity costs for residences will be charged out at over 21 cents per kilowatt (kWh). That will only get worse as more contracted wind and solar plants enter the grid. Add in expected increases in the “delivery” and “regulatory” lines, tack on HST and all-in costs will be in the neighbourhood of 30 cents a kWh! Ontario residents will be challenging Germany and Denmark for the privilege of having the most expensive rates in the industrialized world.
Some relief!
Please share this important information with all of your contacts!

Wildlife Massacred in the Name of Faux-Green Energy!

Photo

CreditMatt Huynh

DISEASE and heedless management ofwind turbines are killing North America’s bats, with potentially devastating consequences for agriculture and human health.

We have yet to find a cure for the disease known as white-nose syndrome, which has decimated populations of hibernating, cave-dwelling bats in the Northeast. But we can reduce the turbine threat significantly without dismantling them or shutting them down.

White-nose syndrome (also known as W.N.S.) was first documented in February 2006 in upstate New York, where it may have been carried from Europe to a bat cave on an explorer’s hiking boot. In Europe, bats appear to be immune, likely the outcome of a long evolutionary process. But in North America, bats are highly susceptible to the cold-loving fungus that appears in winter on the muzzle and other body parts during hibernation, irritating them awake at a time when there is no food. They end up burning precious stores of energy and starve to death.

The consequences have been catastrophic. A 2011 study of 42 sites across five Eastern states found that after 2006 the populations of tri-colored and Indiana bats declined by more than 70 percent, and little brown bats by more than 90 percent. The population of the northern long-eared bat, once common, has declined by an estimated 99 percent and prompted a proposal from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to list it as an endangered species. Other species of hibernating cave-dwelling bats have declined precipitously as well.

Whether these bats will recover or go extinct is unclear. Meanwhile, W.N.S. continues to spread rapidly. On the back of this year’s extremely cold winter, it moved into Michigan and Wisconsin. It is now confirmed in 23 states and five Canadian provinces.

Tree-dwelling bats don’t seem to be affected by W.N.S., since they don’t hibernate in caves. But wind farms are killing them.

Wind turbines nationwide are estimated to kill between 600,000 and 900,000 bats a year, according to a recent study in the journal BioScience. About half of those lost to turbines are hoary bats, which migrate long distances seasonally throughout North America. Eastern red and silver-haired bats, commonly seen in Central Park in New York City hunting insects at night, are also being killed by turbines by the tens of thousands.

We can’t afford to lose these creatures. In the Northeast, all of our native bat species eat insects. One little brown bat can eat 1,000 mosquitoes in an hour, reducing the potential for mosquito-borne diseases. A colony of 150 big brown bats can protect crops from up to 33 million rootworms over a growing season. The Mexican free-tailed bats of Bracken Cave in south-central Texas consume about 250 tons of insects every summer night. The natural pest control provided by that species across eight Texas counties has been valued at nearly $750,000 as it protects the $6 million summer cotton crop. Nationwide, the value of bats as pest controllers is estimated to be at least $3.7 billion and possibly much more. (This leaves out the value of two other very important services that bats provide: controlling insect-borne diseases and pollinating commercially valuable plants.)

Today, genetic engineering may seem to provide an effective way to protect crops from insects, but pests have already developed resistance to some of these products. Insects also readily evolve resistance to chemical insecticides, and increased use of these chemicals would come at a great cost to human health. But bats have shared the night skies with insects for at least 50 million years, and they know how to hunt and eat them.

Fortunately, we can reduce the mortality caused by wind farms, which are often located on windy routes favored by some migratory bats. Wind turbines usually switch on automatically at wind speeds of about 8 to 9 miles per hour, speeds at which insects and bats are active. But if, during times of peak bat activity, energy companies recalibrated their turbines to start at a wind speed of about 11 miles per hour, which is too windy for insects and bats to fly, turbine-related deaths could be reduced by 44 to 93 percent, according to a 2010 study published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. The effect on power output would be negligible — less than 1 percent annually.

Threats to bats also threaten us. We should step up research on the prevention and cure of white-nose syndrome. And we should require energy companies to take steps to protect bats from collisions with wind turbines. It is foolish to spend enormous sums to create pesticides and transgenic crops to fight insects, while investing little to protect bats, our most efficient insect fighters.

Government has NO Business Funding Useless Wind Turbines!

May 11. 2014 

George Fenwick: Taxpayers should

not be forced to subsidize bird-killing

wind turbines

SINCE EARLY in our nation’s founding, we have placed a high value on conserving native wildlife so that future generations will be able to experience and benefit from wild species as we do today. Yet even as our federal government has ’sequestered’ federal funds and been forced to shutter national parks during contentious government shutdowns, we taxpayers have been regularly tapped, year after year, by large corporate wind companies to provide them with tax credits they demand in order to make a profit of their ventures.

Taxpayers may not be aware that they have funded for several years — through the federal government’s Production Tax Credit (PTC) — a public subsidy that can create a perverse incentive to put wind turbines in areas that produce little electricity but would have a devastating impact on migratory birds.

As presently configured, the PTC provides 2.3 cents per kilowatt generated, largely to wind energy companies. Poorly sited wind energy development kills significant numbers of birds and bats and alters sensitive wildlife habitat. At the current estimated mortality rate, the wind industry is killing hundreds of thousands of birds and bats per year and is expected to kill well over one million per year as projects are built to reach the federal goal of 20 percent renewable energy by 2030.

While these numbers represent a relatively small percentage of the total number of birds and bats estimated to reside in or breed in North America, many of the species being killed are already declining for other reasons, and this mortality can exacerbate these declines. In fact, the North American Breeding Bird Survey shows that between 1966 and 2010, 40 percent of neotropical migratory birds (55 of 137 species assessed) had significant negative population trends. The mortality due to wind turbines is just one more factor contributing to the cumulative impact of humans on wild bird and bat populations.

In addition, many species are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Killing them is a violation of federal law punishable by significant fines.

We all want clean, renewable energy, but wind power cannot be considered “green” if it is unnecessarily killing large numbers of birds and bats. However, we truly can have it both ways. Making wind power a win-win proposition for conservation-minded taxpayers is not overly complicated. Two key actions need to be taken.

The first is that “no-go” zones need to be established for the industry in the most sensitive locations where the toll on birds simply outweighs the benefits of wind development. American Bird Conservancy has already developed maps showing those areas.

The second is that the voluntary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) permitting guidelines, by which the wind industry is currently guided, need to be made mandatory. Since the Energy Policy Act of 1992 established the PTC, the federal government has doled out billions of dollars and hoped that the for-profit wind industry would voluntarily do the right things to minimize impacts to birds and bats.

In addition to their inherent beauty and cultural and scientific importance, birds and bats also have an incalculable value by maintaining the ecosystems on which humans depend. For example, birds and bats eat billions of insects each year that left unchecked could decimate our crops, damage our forests, or lead to more use of troubling pesticides. Bats are equally valuable. In one eight-county region of Texas, Brazilian free-tailed bats saved local farmers an estimated $740,000 annually in crop damage and pesticide costs by feeding on corn earworm and cotton bollworm.

Unfortunately, in the case of wind energy, rapid development has gotten way out ahead of the science and regulatory framework. Setting reasonable regulatory sideboards for the industry and putting key, sensitive areas off limits are two principles that should be non-negotiable as renewal of the PTC is considered. It harkens back to an old standard in business dealings to which most of us have grown accustomed. It is called quid pro quo.

George Fenwick is president of the American Bird Conservancy in Washington, D.C.

 

Destroyed Roads…..one of many problems with Wind Turbines

Where will wind companies get the money to pay for roads?

I read the article in last week’s Sachem concerning the roadwork that will be required once the wind turbine companies are finished.

First of all, isn’t it nice that our county has waived the half load restrictions for these guys, once again displaying their eagerness to bend over backwards for anything related to the folly known as the Green Energy Act?

Secondly, it seems that the wind turbine companies themselves will be on the hook for the costs of the repairs.

Whew… that’s a relief. But where will they get the money? From the Ontario government, of course. And the Ontario government will get it from us. Samsung, in particular, loves to spend our tax dollars. I’m sure we paid the tab when Samsung took Mayor Hewitt on that little golf outing a couple of years back. We can only hope he golfs better than he governs.

Brad Smith,

Dunnville

Kathleen Wynne is destroying our Province. Time Hudak will turn things around!

Kathleen Wynne says Tim Hudak will

plunge Ontario into recession as

PCs take aim at Liberals’ ‘bloated’ energy bureaucracy

Keith Leslie, Canadian Press | May 12, 2014 | Last Updated: May 12 2:11 PM ET
More from Canadian Press

Ontario PC Leader Tim Hudak, left, walks in with employees before he makes an announcement at a packaging plant about creating 40,000 jobs in Ontario with affordable energy during a campaign stop in Smithville, Ont., on Monday, May 12, 2014.

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan DenetteOntario PC Leader Tim Hudak, left, walks in with employees before he makes an announcement at a packaging plant about creating 40,000 jobs in Ontario with affordable energy during a campaign stop in Smithville, Ont., on Monday, May 12, 20

TORONTO — Ontario’s opposition parties started the second week of the campaign for the June 12 election Monday by focusing on soaring electricity bills, which they blamed on the Liberal government’s green energy policies.

Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak said he’d end generous subsidies for wind and solar power, cut the “bloated” bureaucracy at Hydro One and Ontario Power Generation to help get electricity rates low enough to generate 40,000 new jobs.

“We need to pare down that massive hydro bureaucracy,” Hudak said at a factory in Smithville, in the Niagara Peninsula.

“They have 11,000 people in the hydro bureaucracy making $100,000 a year, can you believe that?”

After announcing plans last Friday to trim 100,000 public sector jobs, Hudak also said he would reduce the number of provincial electricity agencies created after the breakup of the old Ontario Hydro.

Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne says Hudak’s plan for the province would plunge Ontario back into a recession.

Wynne says Hudak’s “reckless” election campaign pledge to shrink the public sector by 100,000 jobs would “sacrifice our fragile economic recovery.”

Speaking at the Carpenters’ Union local 27 training centre in Vaughan, Wynne said Hudak would fire many of the people who hire skilled tradespeople for home renovations.

“We believe this is exactly the wrong way to go,” she said.

“His approach would sacrifice our fragile economic recovery and would plunge us back toward recession. That may be his approach but it’s not mine and it is not ours.”

Wynne says when people can’t afford to build or renovate their homes, highly skilled apprentices would have trouble finding work.

She says a Liberal government would safeguard those jobs by investing $130 billion over a decade in infrastructure projects across the province.

Hudak has said that if his party wins the June 12 provincial election, he wants to shrink the public sector to increase efficiencies and spur job creation in the private sector.

“Unlike Tim Hudak, we believe that jobs are more important than cuts,” Wynne said. “Tim Hudak is proposing a reckless and really devastating cut that would take 100,000 jobs and would replace those with pink slips. He’s making a pink-slip pledge.”

Campaigning in Thunder Bay, Ont., New Democrat Leader Andrea Horwath promised to scrap the provincial portion of HST on hydro bills if she becomes premier, which she said would save homeowners about $120 a year.

“Instead of making life affordable, the Liberals decided to add an unfair tax on top of the highest electricity rates in the country,” said Horwath. “We’re going to take it off and make life affordable for families.”

Premier Kathleen Wynne spent the first part of her day on the radio, defending the Liberals’ decisions to cancel two gas plants in Oakville and Mississauga, which could cost taxpayers up to $1.1 billion.

They have 11,000 people in the hydro bureaucracy making $100,000 a year, can you believe that?

Wynne said former premier Dalton McGuinty did “what he believed was right,” but added that she has tried to rectify mistakes that she believes were made.

Campaigning later in Vaughan, north of Toronto, Wynne said hydro rates went up in large part because the government had to make massive investments to repair and upgrade Ontario’s electricity system after years of neglect.

“There’s a cost associated with that, and so we are working to make sure that there are programs and supports in place for people who are struggling to pay for their electricity,” she said. “But are we going to back away from clean, renewable energy? No, we’re not going to do that.”

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren Calabrese

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren CalabreseOntario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne speaks in front of carpenter apprentices and other Liberal candidates during a campaign stop at the Carpenters’ Union Local 27 Training Centre in Vaughan, Ont. on Monday, May 12, 2014.

Hudak lashed out at both the Liberals and the NDP for rising electricity bills.

“A billion dollars in the gas plants scandal to save a couple Liberal seats and you folks got stuck with the bill,” he said.

“And the NDP, they’re really just the great pretenders. They say they care about hydro rates but they voted with the Liberals each and every time.”

Wynne went on the attack against Hudak’s plan to wipe out tens of thousands of public sector jobs in an effort to eliminate the $12.5-billion deficit in just two years.

“We have a plan to cut ribbons at construction sites. Tim Hudak’s plan is to cut jobs at construction sites,” she said.

“Our steady balanced approach would invest in transit, invest in infrastructure, and it invests in skills training to help the people of Ontario get good jobs.”

Hudak said he’s giving people the “hard talk and the plain truth,” while the Liberals and NDP are making promises Ontario can’t afford.

“If this were a popularity contest, you’d promise everything under the sun to all people,” he said. “I’m actually proposing some pretty tough choices, but I think we owe it to Ontarians to be honest with them about the mess that we’re in.”

— With files from Maria Babbage, Diana Mehta and Colin Perkel

Conservatives are our only chance to save province! Lib/NDP promise more of same!

MONTE SOLBERG - Ontario's future in hands of voters

QUEEN’S PARK

Credits: FILE PHOTO/Dave ThomasToronto Sun/QMI Agency

MONTE SOLBERG | QMI AGENCY

Ontario is great. Without Ontario we wouldn’t have the Great Lakes, Bobby Orr or that secret club in Toronto’s Rosedale where the chattering class gathers to decide our future, and to chatter. It’s also Canada’s once and, we hope, future economic growth engine.We need to keep this in mind now that Ontario is in an election, and as the party leaders tour the province in hope of winning the support of unsuspecting voters. They will do this by kissing babies and shaking hands (confusing the two is a definite no-no).The leaders will say optimistic things, criticize their opponents and, we hope, propose fresh ideas. The fresh ideas part is the part that moves the province forward. So far, so good.

But not all ideas are equal. They should fit the times, and address the biggest problems. It is also not a good thing if the proposed ideas make the existing problems even worse. In some cases those new ideas might one day become the biggest problem. This is where the toothy Kathleen Wynne should walk on the stage, smiling, though I’m not sure why she’s smiling.

Ontario’s economy has struggled for years. Sure, as the U.S. economy eventually recovers, Ontario will get towed along behind it, but waiting for another economy to emerge from recession is not a strategy; it’s the lack of a strategy.

So instead of bringing forward new ideas on the economy, the Liberals have essentially declared that it’s not the economy stupid, it’s — get ready for it — retirement income.

Unfortunately, Wynne’s Ontario Retirement Pension Plan idea would actually hold back the kind of recovery that could one day make her pension plan idea more feasible. Oh, the delicious and fattening irony.

That said, the Liberals have not even established that Ontarians require more retirement income. They certainly haven’t made the case that it’s a higher priority than creating jobs, resource development in the Ring of Fire, a sensible energy policy that allows manufacturing to compete, or half a dozen other pressing needs. She is fleeing from those issues, because if she is forced to speak to them she’ll have to acknowledge that her government after a decade in power has not made the progress that it should have made. Their handling of the energy file alone should be a firing offence.

PC Leader Tim Hudak has not set Ontario aflame with his fiery rhetoric or his charisma. Instead he has stayed relevant by hanging in there and not doing anything stupid. Most importantly, his instincts are right. He has set his sights clearly on working-class Ontario with his Million Jobs Plan. He understands that your employer can’t pay into your pension plan if you don’t have an employer because you don’t have a job. That might seem obvious, but not obvious enough that the other two leaders have acted accordingly. Still Hudak must add details to his plan and be credible in selling it.

This is far from a slam dunk for Hudak. Kathleen Wynne remains personally popular. Almost everything hinges on the vagaries of the campaign and whether Ontarians have had enough to want change.

Help PEFCN and APPEC fight the Wind Turbines! Here’s how!

Big Yard Sale on May 24 to benefit PECFN and APPEC legal funds — Donate items / Find treasures

YARD SALE

SATURDAY MAY 24, 2014

(rain date May 25)

9 am to 4 pm

14011 HIGHWAY # 33

FUNDRAISER FOR PECFN AND APPEC

Spring cleaning?

Why not put aside those unwanted items that someone else may be able to use and support the legal funds to stop wind turbines in the County.

Large donations can be dropped off at 7 am the day of the sale at the big barn, 14011 Highway #33, near corner of County Rd 32.

Alternatively, pick up of larger saleable items (no junk or bedding please) can be arranged by emailing contactus@appec.ca .  Include your name, address, phone number and brief description of item(s).

Small items can dropped off at Royal LePage, 104 Main Street Picton from Wednesday May 21 to Friday May 23.

Donate and/or come out to the Yard Sale on May 24 and find a treasure.

Tickets for the South Marysburgh Heritage House and Winery Tour will be available to purchase at the Yard Sale.