|
Ontario Wind Turbines
Ontario has the most expensive electricity in North America “Ontario is probably the worst electricity market in the world,” Ontario’s Energy Policy affects every person in Ontario. Eleven years ago, Ontario had a vibrant energy sector. It has changed since then. Ripley-KincardineRipley-Kincardine, Lake Huron Over the next 20 years, your household will pay an additional $40,000 for electricity. The cost of wind power will add $110,000,000,000.00 to our electrical bills. Ontario is building 6736 Wind Turbines. We already have clean and excess power from water, nuclear and gas. Bruce Peninsula We pay more for wind power than any province/state in North America. We are subsidizing the wind industry. The Ontario Government pays the wholesale price of 11-13.5 cents per kwh for wind power. Ontario hydro consumers pay for a debt that was actually paid off in 2010. In 2007, you paid 7 cents per kwh. 1699 kwh costs $210 = 14 cents per kwh. Compare our rates to: 6.8 cents in Quebec and 7.9 cents in Manitoba. Pro-wind groups claim that our expensive electricity is due to expensive nuclear power. Shelburne Manufacturing is leaving Ontario. “Ontario has the highest industrial rates in North America.” Caterpillar (2 plants), United Steel. Heinz, Bicks, International Trucking, NOVA Chemicals says the cost of power is critical in its decision to locate a multi-billion-dollar polyethylene expansion in Sarnia Ontario. Since 2006, power usage has decreased by 6%. “Ontario’s economy has not performed on par with the rest of Canada, Bruce Peninsula Gone are the days of beautiful Ontario…. “These wind projects will change this place more totally, more rapidly and more permanently The Human & Environmental Impact To appreciate the full impact of turbines on our people, please find the time to read this: Wind companies pay proportionally less taxes than the rest of us; turbines are assessed at a fraction of the actual value. Wind companies are exempt from many Ontario laws. Examples: municipal bylaws, building permits, road weight restrictions, proximity to highways, drainage. cranes The Ministries of Environment and Natural Resources have changed laws that apply only to wind companies. Example: there is no protection of wetlands; death or harm to endangered species. Wind companies routinely sue municipalities/persons who get in their way. The government supplies lawyers to back a wind company; Laws were passed where municipalities have no rights regarding wind projects in their jurisdiction. Every turbine will permanently destroy 3 acres of land; roughly 21,000 acres of farmland lost forever. The Birds swans-thedford-bogMarch 2014 – Lambton Shores – Rest area for Migrating Tundra Swans People call turbines bird blenders because they slice, maim and slaughter birds. A Perspective of Turbine Height Using the Absolute Towers in Mississauga rendered in as a backdrop: Three The rendering below provides a perspective of Ontario’s new turbines. TheMega Ontario’s wind energy policy is convoluted and wastes money. Nuclear, hydro, & gas is clean, cheap and has a 100% reliability, but, wind is given priority to our grid. Truth is stranger than fiction Ontario pays 11-13.5 cents for wind power. New York State sees an opportunity. Wolfe Island – photo rendering shows pre-turbine days Wolfe Island – actual photo The Vulnerability of our Grid When produced, power has to be used immediately; there’s no technology to store it for a later time. According to the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers: Carbon Dioxide Emissions will increase by 48% in 2030, Much of our wind power will go to Quebec and the States. Constant changes to the grid are prone to error and Ontario’s grid wasn’t built to handle such. Chatham-Kent-wind-turbines-from-Lake-Erie-and-Rondeau-Bay15 Ontario has more than enough power with Nuclear, Hydro (water) and Gas. Ontario’s average demand for power is roughly 18,000 mw. The amount of available power is 30,806 mw which far exceeds the demand. The Liberals will have added 3725 mw of installed wind energy by the end of 2014; “Ontario will phase in wind, solar and bioenergy (Ontario is offering 44-88 cents per kwh for solar and bioenergy.) Chatham Kent – photo rendering shows pre-turbine days Chatham Kent – actual photo Does this make sense to you?? ”The province’s wind and solar power initiatives were decided and implemented in such haste There are about 50 resident wind lobbyists in Toronto. The Liberals introduced and passed the Green Energy Act 2009. This has been going on for years. One example: The Wind Industry held a fundraising event for Kathleen Wynne in April 2013. Those who promote Wind power, benefit financially by doing so. A wind company is getting a pass on violating the law? Lake Ontario – photo rendering shows pre-turbine days Lake Ontario – actual photosail Every project could be stopped today; if the Liberals want to. The Ontario Government has the discretionary power to cancel or modify these contracts but it’s clear they don’t want to. An Ontario court ruling in the decision of Trillium vs. Ontario, 2013, clearly states that: As of March, 2014, the Liberals are continuing with the 55 incomplete wind power projects (about 4900 turbines) that could be stopped legally. “If you are asking me, will you cancel those [wind project] contracts outright? The answer is no we won’t!” For ruling, refer to Discussion at the bottom of this page Chatham Kent Airport Energy Platform by Party The PC’s introduced Bill 42 in 2012 and Bill 39 in 2013 to eliminate wind subsidies and give control back to municipalities. Liberal Will be pursuing additional wind power projects in 2015 and again in 2016. NDP Committed to “aggressively expand renewable energy”. Progressive Conservatives Scrap Ontario’s wind energy policy. “We propose scrapping the Green Energy Act and implementing an immediate moratorium Wolfe Island121 Wolfe Island before & after the Liberal’s energy policies Is Nothing Sacred? Temple_Rendering___Content Near Peterborough, a $40 million project to build the largest Buddhist complex outside of China is in jeopardy. Wind Farms slated for Ontario Click here to see maps of these projects Rondeau Bay – photo rendering showing pre-turbine days Rondeau Bay – Actual photo Wind verses Nuclear Nuclear power costs 6.8 cents per kwh, period. tmap In 10-20 years The Niagara Falls hydro generating stations are 100 years old, but wind turbines are good for only 10-20 years. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation: |
unaffordable renewables
Wind Weasels are NOT known for their Integrity!!!
Danish Fan Maker Vestas Run by Crooks – and that’s a FACT
Does anyone remember Vestas?
The struggling Danish fan maker used to be a “big player” in Australia’s wind industry – having sold hundreds of its turbines here. But – with Australia’s wind industry on the ropes – Vestas just seems to have lost interest in Australia – because we’ve hardly heard a peep out of them for ages.
It seems like aeons since Vestas launched its risible “Act on Facts” campaign – aimed at foiling the work done by STT (and others) – and in an effort to quell the growing community backlash against giant fans that blew up all over rural Australia (see our post here).
Launching its fan-propaganda campaign last June, Vestas trotted out the usual band of eco-fascist suspects, including a former tobacco advertising guru – who pitches himself as an “expert” on, well, just about everything.
Lately, he’s even taken to pontificating about energy market economics – citing Spain as his prime example of sound energy policy; no, REALLY, Spain. Yep, that’s right, the Country with 26% unemployment – that’s bankrupted itself by throwing mountains of taxpayer’s money at wind power – only to pull the plug on wind power subsidies, as power prices spiralled out of control, the thousands of promised “green” jobs failed to materialise and the money ran out (see our post here). He even cites Germany as a model for energy policy – no, seriously – we’re supposed to follow the lead of a Country where close to a million households have been chopped from the grid, thanks to the insane cost of renewable energy and, notwithstanding all that human misery, CO2 emissions have increased (see our post here). For a good belly laugh – see this fantastic story. What’s that you say about overreach?
Anyway, we digress. Vestas went on the propaganda front foot, spending $millions in Australia to “shape the debate” – paying its team of dilettante advocates and juvenile propagandists a bucket of loot to “win hearts and minds” – and threw a fat pile of cash at the Australian Greens in their futile efforts to unseat STT Champion, SA Senator, Nick Xenophon at the Federal election last September (see our post here).
The Greens continue to pocket mountains of wind industry money – and remain surprisingly coy about the bulging war chest they used for their campaign during the recent re-run of the Western Australian Senate election, refusing to say just who the big donor was. We think the key donor starts with the letter “V”.
Instead of spending $millions hectoring Australians to “Act on Facts” and bankrolling the Greens, Vestas would have been better served keeping its cheque-book in the top drawer and dealing with more serious matters, much closer to home.
You see, Vestas is, apparently, run by a bunch of crooks – who seem very keen to line their own pockets at shareholders’ expense. Here’s The Copenhagen Post on just how low these boys can go.
Vestas scandal continues to widen
The Copenhagen Post
7 May 2014
Vestas reported Nørremark to the financial crimes office back in December 2012 because of some financial transactions in India
The Danish financial crimes office’s 18-month investigation into a former Vestas head of finance, Henrik Nørremark, has taken a dramatic turn and has been expanded to include a number of other former Vestas bosses.
The police unit is now looking into whether the former bosses had abused their positions to secure private financial gains through business dealings in the wind turbine industry.
“I can confirm that it looks as if some employees, who have had their own companies, have engaged in various forms of business which could be in conflict with the interests of Vestas,” Henrik Helmer Steen, the head of the financial crimes office, told Jyllands-Posten newspaper.
Steen added that it was too early to say whether current employees are also deemed to be involved in the case.
Vestas tight-lipped
Vestas reported Nørremark to the financial crimes office back in May 2013 because of some financial transactions in India, but in the last few weeks it has emerged that the wind turbine giant has lodged another police report in Germany due to other transactions involving Hans Jørn Rieks, a former head of Vestas Central Europe. That case is connected with the Nørremark case, police say.
“The connection is that we can recognise the investigative theme in the Germany case from our own case,” Steen said. “They involve the employees’ own companies, whose business is apparently linked to Vestas’ business.”
Nørremark has rejected any notion of wrongdoing, while Rieks has refused to comment on the situation. Vestas has been tight-lipped on the subject, but said that it has undertaken several internal investigations since the two former bosses left the company.
The Copenhagen Post
Very unlike Vestas to be “tight-lipped”.
STT can hardly think of any other company that’s ever been more “loose-lipped”?
What’s the matter boys, rampant corporate malfeasance not the kind of “FACT” the public should know about?
Here’s The Copenhagen Post from May last year detailing the origins of the Vesta’s scandal.
Vestas report former financial head to police
The Copenhagen Post
24 May 2013
Questionable dealings with Indian partner cost wind turbine giant 140 million kroner
A dispute between wind turbine maker Vestas and its former financial head, Henrik Nørremark, is now in the hands of the public prosecutor for economic and international crime, Statsadvokaten for Særlig Økonomisk og International Kriminalitet, more commonly known as the financial police.
The case hinges on Nørremark’s relationship with a Vestas partner in India. Nørremark is accused of making decisions that he was not empowered to make that cost the company 140 million kroner.
Police have started their investigation, speaking to senior mangers, employees and Vestas’s CEO, Ditlev Engel.
The company said that it intends to hold Nørremark financially responsible if he is found culpable for costing the company money.
“The Vestas board wants every part of this case scrutinized, and we want the missing money back,” Vestas’s board chairman, Bert Nordberg, said in a statement. “We first had external lawyers and accountants carry out an extensive investigation that showed that the board and the head of the company were not involved in or aware of these transactions.”
The statement said that the independent investigation was unable to discover where the missing money was spent, prompting the company to turn the matter over to the financial police.
Nørremark allegedly entered into agreements with Indian partners who forgave debts of 33 million kroner and invested more than 107 million kroner in a project in India.
The huge investment was far more than Nørremark was allowed to make, according to company spokesperson Morton Albæk, who said that any expenditure that large was subject to approval by Engel and others.
Both the board and Engel deny knowing the details of the India deal.
Nørremark’s lawyer declined comment on the case but said that he was not surprised that it had been turned over to the police.
Nørremark has previously said through his lawyer that he belived that providing the debt relief was within his powers and that the remaining funds were lost in India on purchasing and developing land for a wind farm project that did not materialize.
Nørremark was fired in early 2012. In October of that year, Vestas announced that it had ceased payment of Nørremark’s severance package as a result of the allegations against him.
The Copenhagen Post
This couldn’t be happening to a nicer bunch of lads.
Faux-green wind turbines are not worth a dime!
This is why wind energy can neither have nor produce nice things
POSTED AT 9:21 PM ON MAY 7, 2014 BY ERIKA JOHNSEN
The wind lobby has yet to give up on their quest to renew the egregiously generous production tax credit that essentially keeps the wind industry afloat by providing 2.3 cents for every kilowatt-hour of energy output during the first ten years of a given project’s operation; that lucrative subsidy expired on January 1st of this year, but it wouldn’t be the first time — or the second, or the third – that Congress has belatedly bestowed a retroactive extension. Most recently, the wind industry was awarded a one-year extension of the credit at the start of 2013, with the new and convenient condition that any project that simplybegan construction in 2013 would receive the full benefits of the credit (whereas in the past, installations had to be completed) — and for a demonstration of just how precious that credit really is, here are a couple of handy visuals via The Atlantic:

According to the AWEA, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group, wind turbine installations hit a record 8,385 megawatts in the fourth quarter of 2012 only to crash in the first quarter of 2013 to 1.6 megawatts—and, yes, the decimal place is in the right place. In other words, thousands of wind turbines went online at the end of 2012 to power about 2.1 million American homes. Three months later, about one more turbine had been installed, generating just enough juice to supply about 405 homes.
The downdraft continued in the first quarter of this year, according to the AWEA, when 133 turbines producing 433 megawatts went online. …

Read: Installations skyrocketed in 2012 before dropping off like crazy when the credit expired, and then when the credit was renewed with the new and more flexible condition that projects only needed to have begun construction before it expired at the end of 2013, a bunch of projects got in just under the wire. Could the wind industry’s utter dependence ongovernment taxpayer “help” (which actually discourages the price efficiency that could make wind viable in the long run) be any more apparent?
But rather than heeding my umpteenth rant on the mind-boggling perversity of supporting a technology that so clearly cannot survive in the free market based on its own competitive merits, let’s mix it up and look to — oh, I don’t know — how about billionaire Warren Buffet, noted supporter of hiking taxes on the wealthy, in Omaha this past weekend? Via the editors of the WSJ:
So it was fascinating to hear Mr. Buffett explain that his real tax rule is to pay as little as possible, both personally and at the corporate level. “I will not pay a dime more of individual taxes than I owe, and I won’t pay a dime more of corporate taxes than we owe. And that’s very simple,” Mr. Buffett told Fortune magazine in an interview last week.
The billionaire was even more explicit about his goal of reducing his company’s tax payments. “I will do anything that is basically covered by the law to reduce Berkshire’s tax rate,” he said. “For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That’s the only reason to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.”
Think about that one. Mr. Buffett says it makes no economic sense to build wind farms without a tax credit, which he gladly uses to reduce his company’s tax payments to the Treasury. So political favors for the wind industry induce a leading U.S. company to misallocate its scarce investment dollars for an uneconomic purpose. Berkshire and its billionaire shareholder get a tax break and the feds get less revenue, which must be made up by raising tax rates on millions of other Americans who are much less well-heeled than Mr. Buffett.
Just take a moment and let that really wash over you, and then take a gander at the still other subsidy-goodies the Obama administration is doling out to its politically preferred pet projects. …Just today. Via The Hill:
The Department of Energy (DOE) Wednesday said it will give up to $47 million each to three offshore wind power projects over the next four years to pioneer “innovative” technology.
The planned projects are off the costs of New Jersey, Oregon and Virginia. DOE said the money will help speed the deployment of efficient wind power technologies as part of the government’s effort to expand the use of wind power.
Here’s a preview of the Sun News Documentary, coming soon!!
This Amazing Documentary is Being Funded Very Eagerly, and Should be Ready Soon!
Down Wind
Down Wind reveals the trauma suffered by those whose lives were turned upside down when the towering turbines went in. It exposes the health and psychological problems that followed, and the warnings of medical experts about “wind turbine syndrome.”
From economists we’ll hear about the mind-boggling costs, including the massive taxpayer funded subsidies going to mega corporations.
And we’ll look at the cosy Liberal connections to Big Wind, and how cronies of Dalton McGuinty and Kathleen Wynne have made a fortune off the backs of taxpayers.
Please contribute now to tell this important story.
Kevin McGee, Farmer and Activist
We Need Your Help
With your support, we’ll be able to tell this important story, and keep a focus on it in the future. In gratitude for your generosity, we’ll send you one of the packages listed on the side of this page.

Safety Issues for Planes Near Wind Turbines!
4 killed as Plane slams into Giant Fans in South Dakota
There are at least 2 critical dangers for flyers created by giant fans: 1) air turbulence – generated by a sea of 50-60m blades with their outer tips travelling at around 400km/h – interfering with the ability of the pilot to control their kite (see our post here); and 2) slamming into them – with reasonably predictable results.
As to 1) here’s a report submitted last year to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority by Ted McIntosh (a highly experienced agricultural pilot from NSW):
Date: 18-03-2013
Local time: 0730
State: NSW
Location: 9kms WNW of Gunning Wind Farm, Gunning NSW. Damage to aircraft: nil Most serious injury: nil
Summary:
Whilst on descent to my operating airstrip near Biala NSW, I suddenly experienced severe turbulence at about 500-600ft AGL. The wind at this time had been approx. 5-8 knots from the SE. After landing I ascertained that there was only a slight breeze at ground level. I suspected that the turbulence was caused by the wind turbines at the Gunning Wind Farm but was amazed that the effect could be felt 9kms away.
After the next take-off I confirmed that the turbulence was indeed caused by the turbines.
There are many fixed wing & helicopter aircraft which operate at or below 500 ft AGL legitimately from hundreds of airfields around Australia.
CASA & the Dept. of Infrastructure & Transport have released a study, the National Airports Safeguarding Framework Guidelines D (Wind Turbines) to protect major airports, but it should be apparent that the greater threat to air safety from wind turbine turbulence lies around country airports, both public & private, which threat CASA & the Dept of Infrastructure & Transport have glossed over or ignored.
For aircraft trying to stay aloft or take-off and land safely, weather related turbulence is an unseen menace that often strikes without warning. But it’s hard to envision turbulence being generated by turbines troubling a skilled flyer over 9 km away. So here’s a picture for the uninitiated:
As to 2) here’s a tragic report from South Dakota, where a light plane slammed into a turbine in foggy conditions. And here’s a picture of the culprit:
4 dead as plane crashes at South Dakota wind farm
SFGate (Associated Press)
Dirk Lammers
28 April 2014
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — A small airplane heading back to South Dakota after a Texas cattle sale crashed into a wind farm in foggy weather, killing the pilot and three passengers.
Elizabeth Cory, a spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration, said the Piper 32 was traveling from Hereford, Texas, to Gettysburg, South Dakota. The single-engine plane was registered to Donald J. “D.J.” Fischer of Gettysburg, according to the FAA.
The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating, but authorities have not released any details on the crash.
Authorities have not released the names of the victims, but Luce Funeral Home confirmed that Fischer, the 30-year-old pilot, died. Lien Funeral Home confirmed the deaths of cattlemen Brent Beitelspacher, of Bowdle, and Logan Rau, of Java.
The funeral home handling arrangements for the fourth victim said it could not release any information.
The three passengers were in Hereford to attend a sale of live cattle and embryos, primarily for the production of show steers, said Mike Mimms, a veterinarian who runs the annual event.
Mimms, who performs cattle embryo transfers, said he has probably bought 3,000 cows from Beitelspacher through telephone calls but hadn’t had the opportunity to meet him until this past weekend.
“I got a Christmas card from him this Christmas,” Mimms said. “It was the first time I even knew what he looked like, and he’s standing there with his family with young kids. And I can’t get that image out of my mind.”
Fischer, a crop sprayer for Air Kraft Spraying Inc., followed in his father’s footsteps into the aerial business and was extremely involved in his community, said state Rep. Corey Brown, R- Gettysburg.
Brown, a longtime family friend, said Fischer had just gotten married in March and was a volunteer emergency medical technician who was often out on calls.
“This is one of those things that’s going to hit the community pretty hard, because I would venture to say there are probably are not many people here who D.J. didn’t touch their life in some way,” Brown said.
Fischer attended South Dakota State University and played defensive tackle for the school’s football team from 2002-2005.
John Stiegelmeier, SDSU’s head football coach, described Fischer as a gifted athlete who was a great friend to his teammates.
“I’m a small school guy and he was the same — phenomenal work ethic, phenomenal loyalty to the coaching staff and his teammates,” Stiegelmeier said. “Whatever you asked D.J. to do, he did it, with a smile on his face, too. He didn’t hesitate.”
Mimms said the three cattlemen noted that they had a rough flight down to Texas due to high winds, and conditions were similar in Hereford when they left Sunday morning.
“They made it through the windy weather, and the fog was the problem when they got there,” he said.
The wreckage was found Monday at the South Dakota Wind Energy Center, a site south of Highmore with 27 turbines that are about 213 feet tall, plus the length of the blade.
Steve Stengel, a spokesman with Florida-based NextEra Energy Inc., said there was damage to a turbine but he couldn’t say what part of the tower was hit.
“It’s been so foggy up there and we haven’t had a chance to investigate,” Stengel said Monday.
Fog and low clouds combined for reduced visibility in the Highmore area on Sunday night, and winds were out of the east at about 15 to 25 mph, said Renee Wise, meteorologist with the National Weather Service office in Aberdeen. There were also scattered showers across region Sunday night, and some might have been heavy at times, she said.
Mimms, said the news has sent shock and sadness through the close-knit ranching community.
“There are a lot of people out there who feel like they lost one of their best friends,” Mimms said.
Similar conditions contributed to a 2008 crash in southeast Minnesota. Federal investigators concluded the pilot of a 1948 Cessna 140 lacked proper instrument training for the day’s foul weather. The National Transportation Safety Board’s probable cause report also noted the pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane while maneuvering around a wind farm.
Associated Press SF Gate
This may be the first time this has happened, but it won’t be the last. Stick a line of obstacles taller than the Sydney Harbour Bridge on top of elevated ridgelines and it’s a matter of when (and how many) not if.
For flyers just trying to get from A to B the additional (and unnecessary) risk created by giant fans is bad enough. But spare a thought for those called on to fly in and among these things on routine basis – eg, crop dusters and fire-fighters involved in water-bombing (see our post here).
Just another reason to can the fans.
Ezra Levant, Rebecca Thompson and Sun News, Producing a Documentary about Windscam!
| WE NEED YOUR HELP
– Help expose the ugly truth behind Wind Turbine power generation – |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Climate alarmists use fear as a sales gimmick!
OF THE DATA — A DESTRUCTIVE EPISODE OF
BAD SCIENCE GONE BERSERK
’600 page litany of doom’: Weather Channel Co-Founder John Coleman slams Federal climate report: A ‘total distortion of the data and agenda driven, destructive episode of bad science gone berserk’
Coleman: ‘When the temperature data could no longer be bent to support global warming, they switched to climate change and now blame every weather and climate event on CO2 despite the hard, cold fact that the “radiative forcing” theory they built their claims on has totally failed to verify.’
‘The current bad science is all based on a theory that the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the exhaust of the burning of fossil fuels leads to a dramatic increase in “the greenhouse effect” causing temperatures to skyrocket uncontrollably. This theory has failed to verify and is obviously dead wrong. But the politically funded and agenda driven scientists who have built their careers on this theory and live well on the 2.6 billion dollars of year of Federal grants for global warming/climate change research cling to this theory and bend the data spread to support the glorified claims in their reports and papers.’
The sky is falling.
“Climate Change” is running wild and disaster is certain unless we immediately stop burning coal and oil and move quickly to “green energy” to eliminate use of fossil fuels. Heat waves, huge floods, powerful storms, droughts and rising seas are on the verge of killing millions of us and destroying our civilization. That is my summary of the new Federal Assessment of Climate Change issued by a Obama administration team of more than 300 specialists guided by a 60-member federal advisory committee produced the report. It was reviewed by federal agencies and a panel of the National Academy of Sciences.
This 600 page litany of doom and gloom has received extensive coverage by the panting anchors of the national media who feel important when tell their audience that “the sky is falling.” Horrible pictures of storms, floods, drought and heat waves leaped out of the TV sets as the New York and Washington DC headquartered media was particularly excited to tell us how the huge increases in floods and storms was the worst in that part of the nation.
If you accept the picture painted by this report, the weather was just right, steady and nice in the historic past but because our industrialized society has powered its heating and air conditioning, its transportation by train, plane, cars and trucks, generated it’s electric power to run our lights, computers, television and smart phones with fossil fuels it has triggered this nightmare of awful storms, droughts and heat waves.
I am deeply disturbed to have to suffer through this total distortion of the data and agenda driven, destructive episode of bad science gone berserk. The only good news is that I least where I am and on the channels and websites I saw I was not further insulted by fawning TV Weathercasters visiting the White House and interviewing the President. I best I can tell, on a national level, that turned out to be a non-event (thank goodness).
Please allow me to hold your attention for a few minutes to explain why I don’t buy into this Climate Change alarmism. The climate of Earth has never been “normal” or stable. It has continuously changed through this planet’s 4.5 billion year history. Powerful storms, floods, droughts, heat waves and ice and snow storms have come and gone as long as Earth has existed.
The current bad science is all based on a theory that the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the exhaust of the burning of fossil fuels leads to a dramatic increase in “the greenhouse effect” causing temperatures to skyrocket uncontrollably. This theory has failed to verify and is obviously dead wrong. But the politically funded and agenda driven scientists who have built their careers on this theory and live well on the 2.6 billion dollars of year of Federal grants for global warming/climate change research cling to this theory and bend the data spread to support the glorified claims in their reports and papers.
When the temperature data could no longer be bent to support global warming, they switched to climate change and now blame every weather and climate event on CO2 despite the hard, cold fact that the “radiative forcing” theory they built their claims on has totally failed to verify. Continue reading here…..
Energy Poverty in the UK…
Families ‘struggling with problem debt’
The report says “problem debt” affects 18% of households with children in the UKNearly 2.5 million children are living in families struggling with “problem debt”, according to a report.
The Children’s Society and StepChange debt charity say many families are in an “extremely precarious” position and taking out loans to pay for the basics.
The stress of keeping up with repayments leads to arguments, emotional distress for children and even bullying, the charities say.
Problem debt means being in arrears on at least one bill or credit commitment
The report – The Dept Trap – is backed by the Archbishop of York, the Most Rev John Sentamu, and is based on:
- a survey of 2,000 UK households with dependent children
- an online survey of 4,442 adults
- 15 in-depth interviews with families with debt problems
- a focus group of young people in Manchester
The survey of UK households suggested “problem debt” currently affected nearly one in five (18%).
On average these households owed £3,437 – giving an estimated total of £4.8bn for all households across the UK – to service providers, lenders and government, the research found.
The report has the backing of the Archbishop of York, the Most Rev John SentamuThe findings suggested 1.4 million families across the UK, with 2.4 million dependent children, were in “problem debt”, the charities said.
And a further 2.9 million households with dependent children were on the brink of sliding into financial difficulties and had been struggling to keep up with payments on household bills or credit over the past year.
CHILDREN’S COMMENTS
“I hate [school] because my mum and dad can’t afford the trousers so I have to wear trackies. But my head of my college, I always really annoy him, he goes, ‘You got to get your trousers sorted out.'”
“I like to go out with my friends quite often, and to do that I need a fiver or something to get on the bus home and maybe some food while I’m out. But I’ve sort of like stopped going out with my friends quite recently because a fiver is bread-and-milk money.”
“I hate it when my mum cries. It’s the worst thing in the world.”
“[On your birthday] your parents just want a special day and want you to have, want you to be happy, so they will end up… spending more and need more money… to spend on you and so end up… borrowing.”
Source: Children’s Society and StepChange report
The report says the impact of debt problems on children means many are suffering from anxiety, face bullying at school and having to go without essentials.
Nearly one in five (19%) children aged between 10 and 17 years in families with debt problems told the survey they had been bullied at school as a result of their family’s financial difficulties.
More than half (51%) said they felt embarrassed by their lack of money.
Advertising
The report calls on government to work with creditors and other groups to develop a “breathing space” scheme to give struggling families an extended period of protection from default charges and enforcement action.
There should also be a review of the protection given to families with children against debt enforcement, including the potential harm caused by evictions, bailiffs and court action, it said.
The charities are also calling on the government to review the case for tighter restrictions on loan advertising seen by children.
Children were being exposed to a “barrage” of advertising for credit products that underplayed the risks of falling into debt, the report said.
The charities say children should not pay the price of debtMatthew Reed, Children’s Society chief executive, said: “Families are increasingly relying on debt as a way to make ends meet – but we’re in danger of ignoring the impact this is having on children now and in the future.
“We cannot allow children to pay the price of debt.”
‘Stark warning’
Mike O’Connor, chief executive of StepChange, said: “This report is a stark warning to policy makers, creditors and the wider society of the devastating effects of debt on children.”
Dr Sentamu said: “When the monthly struggle to pay the bills becomes too much, often families think they have no option but to borrow money to provide the basics for their children.
“We need to make sure families living in poverty have somewhere to turn other than to usury-lenders.”
Peter Fleming, from the Local Government Association, said councils had a duty to taxpayers to collect taxes so that “important services like caring for the elderly, collecting bins and fixing roads” were not affected.
“Bailiffs are only ever used as a last resort by councils and struggling families are always encouraged to get in touch with their council for financial support and advice when having trouble paying their bills,” he said.
“New payments plans can be arranged before the situation reaches a stage where bailiffs are involved.”
Nothing but Corruption, from the McWynnty Liberals!

Ontario Provincial Police investigating the destruction of emails in the final days of Dalton McGuinty’s term in office believe that an executive assistant’s password used to access staff computers without a trace was either voluntarily given up or stolen, but they may never find out because she has refused to be interviewed.
Photograph by: Peter J. Thompson , Ottawa Citizen
Ontario Provincial Police investigating the destruction of emails in the final days of Dalton McGuinty’s term in office believe that an executive assistant’s password used to access staff computers without a trace was either voluntarily given up or stolen, but they may never find out because she has refused to be interviewed.
Wendy Wai, executive assistant to the ex-premier’s chief of staff David Livingston, refused a second request by anti-rackets detectives in April.
The last time detectives came calling, they met up with Wai at her new office at Ryerson University in Toronto.
Wai told detectives on July 30, 2013 that David Nicholl, the corporate chief information officer, had given her “some sort of access but I didn’t know anything about what to do with it.” She then declined to answer questions. Detectives tried again to interview her in April as part of the criminal investigation, but she declined a second time.
Her colleagues described Wai’s computer skills as weak and an IT technician said “she used to panic a lot if something wasn’t working as expected and that’s why we got a lot of calls from her.”
Reached by the Citizen, Wai politely declined to say to whom, if anyone, she gave her password. She directed the question to her lawyer, who did not return messages.
Wai is not accused of any wrongdoing and the only suspect in the criminal case so far is Livingston.
The OPP investigation, called Project Hampden, is trying to find out who, if anyone, had a hand in deleting records related to the true costs of the gas-plants scandal.
Livingston is suspected of bringing in Peter Faist, the boyfriend of McGuinty aide Laura Miller, to access hard drives in the premier’s office, four days before Kathleen Wynne was sworn in.
Detectives say that Livingston allegedly enlisted Faist to access hard drives using the cover of Wendy Wai’s profile, which had been boosted with global access powers for the specific purpose to allow someone to do whatever they wanted to any computer in the former premier’s office without leaving a footprint.
So while the powers of her profile were were given super capabilities, her password didn’t change and police believe that she either gave it to someone or it was taken without her permission.
Detectives have built a breach of trust by public officer case against Livingston, and are now looking to see if there are other cases to be made.
But they’ve been having a hard time talking to some of those who played key roles in McGuinty’s office.
Police say Miller and Faist have refused interviews although their lawyers maintain the pair have co-operated fully with police. Livingston, too, has refused to be interviewed.
Months before Faist was allegedly enlisted to access staff computers, Livingston was asking around about storage protocols at the premier’s office and asked cabinet secretary Peter Wallace how existing email accounts could be deleted, according to a search warrant.
“I advised (Livingston) at that point in time that if he was interested in deleting records associated with the public service, this would be futile because we retained our records,” Wallace told detectives.
On Jan. 25, 2013, Livingston went to see then-corporate chief information officer David Nicholl about getting an administrative password “to clean hard drives during the transition period to the new Wynne government,” according to the search warrant application.
The police investigation continues and no one has been charged. The allegations against Livingston have not been tested in court.
Follow on twitter @crimegarden









